Table 34.B Summary of estimated costs per acre, Peas (Southern), fresh market,
one-row equipment, machine harvest, production parameters specified by
Extension Horticulture Specialist, Louisiana, 1997.
ITEM |
UNIT |
PRICE |
QUANTITY |
AMOUNT |
YOUR FARM |
DIRECT EXPENSES |
acre |
dollars 49.56 |
1.0000 |
dollars 49.56 | |
HERBICIDES |
acre |
21.74 |
1.0000 |
21.74 | |
INSECTICIDES |
acre |
21.50 |
1.0000 |
21.50 | |
PACK & HARVEST ITEMS |
acre |
20.00 |
1.0000 |
20.00 | |
SEED |
acre |
56.25 |
1.0000 |
56.25 | |
HARVEST LABOR |
acre |
15.00 |
1.0000 |
15.00 | |
OPERATOR LABOR |
hour |
7.50 |
17.6080 |
132.06 | |
HAND LABOR |
hour |
7.50 |
6.5000 |
48.75 | |
DIESEL FUEL |
gal |
0.85 |
10.3560 |
8.80 | |
ELECTRICITY |
kWh |
0.09 |
12.7500 |
1.15 | |
GASOLINE |
gal |
1.10 |
23.5000 |
25.85 | |
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE |
acre |
51.20 |
1.0000 |
51.20 | |
INTEREST ON OP. CAP. |
acre |
24.09 |
1.0000 |
24.09 |
_________ |
TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES TOTAL FIXED EXPENSES TOTAL SPECIFIED EXPENSES |
---4-75-.-9--4 65.48 -------- 541.42 |
_________ |
Table 34.C Effects of yields and prices on net returns per acre above total
direct expenses, Peas (Southern), fresh market, one-row equipment, machine
harvest, production parameters specified by Extension Horticulture Specialist,
Louisiana, 1997.
Yield |
---------- 13.00 |
---------Price Per Bushel------------ |
---------- 17.00 | ||
14.00 |
15.00 |
16.00 | |||
___-_-_-_-_-_-_--__-_- |
--------Net Returns Per Acre--------- |
---------- | |||
45.00 |
157.36 |
202.36 |
247.36 |
292.36 |
337.36 |
60.00 |
328.21 |
388.21 |
448.21 |
508.21 |
568.21 |
75.00 |
499.06 |
574.06 |
649.06 |
724.06 |
799.06 |
90.00 |
669.91 |
759.91 |
849.91 |
939.91 |
1029.91 |
105.00 |
840.76 |
945.76 |
1050.76 |
1155.76 |
1260.76 |
H-71
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
3. PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
4. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
6. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
7. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
8. The name is absent
9. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
10. The name is absent