The name is absent



gradual adjustment of agricultural resources
takes place. Part-time farming may also help
maintain-a minimum population in the coun-
tryside and conserve a cultivated landscape
(which enhances its value for recreation). From
an economic standpoint, everyone from carpen-
ters to storekeepers benefit from the purchasing
power of these farmers. Basically, two kinds of
contributions can be postulated: direct, when a
part-time farmer performs tasks that are an inte-
gral part of the commercial structure of the local
community; and indirect, in which he/she stimu-
lates both income and employment multipliers.
Part-time farming may also help provide security
to rural communities in times of economic reces-
sion.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of part-time farmers who depend
principally upon off-farm sources of income has
been increasing throughout the U.S., even
though total numbers of farms have declined.
The results of this study indicate that part-time
and full-time farms exhibit significant differ-
ences. Additionally, part-time farms are no less
efficient in allocation of resources and in the
production of food than are full-time farms.
Thus, the observation that an individual is a
part-time farmer does not, in itself, indicate any-
thing about the productivity of that farm unit.

Part-time farming is an important feature to
consider in discussions of the major policy issues
in agriculture and rural development. There are
some economic and social benefits to be obtained
from part-time farming; however, it is not yet
clear whether positive measures need to be taken
to encourage part-time farming. According to
Jones, many farm families do not earn the in-
come that is realistically feasible for them to
earn. Jones attributes this to the lack of adequate
information, including information regarding ap-
propriate changes in farm organization and oper-
ation. Public policies designed to assist small
farmers must recognize the potential return a
farmer may receive from allocating his resources
to off-farm work. Policy makers need to begin
thinking about possible strategies that public pol-
icy could incorporate with respect to part-time
farming.

REFERENCES

Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier
Production Function Models.”
J. Econometrics 1(1977):21-37.

Bagi, F. S. “On Testing the Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions.” Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting Eastern Economic Association, Philadelphia, Pa., April 9-11,
1981.

Barnum, H. N. and L. Squire. “Technology and Relative Economic Efficiency,” unpublished paper,
World Bank, August 1976.

Bateman, W. L., O. L. Walker, and R. A. Jobes. “On Part-Time Farming.” 5. J. Agr. Econ.
6(1974):137-42.

Bauder, Ward W. Characteristics of Families on Small Farms. University of Kentucky, Kentucky Agr.
Exp. Sta. Bull. 644, June 1956.

Bollman Ray D. “Off-Farm Work by Farmers: An Application of the Kinked Demand Curve For
Labor.”
Canadian J. Agr. Econ. 3(1979):37-60.

Buttel, Frederick H. and Howard Newby, eds. The Rural Sociology of the Advanced Societies. Mont-
clair, N.J., Allanheld Osmum & Co. Publ., Inc., 1980.

Carlin, T. A. “Farm Families Narrowed the Income Gap in the 1960’s.” Agr. Fin. Rev. 33(1972):22-26.

Carlin, T. A. and L. M. Ghelfi. “Off-farm Employment and The Farm Sector.” Structure Issues of
American Agriculture,
Washington, D.C.: USDA∕ESCS, Agricultural Economic Report 438,
November 1979.

Chow, G. C. “Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions.” Economet-
rica
28(1960):591-605.

Fliegel, F. C. “Aspirations of Low-Income Farmers and Their Performance and Potential for Change.”
Rural Sociology 24(1969):205-14.

Fugitt, G. V. “A Typology of the Part-Time Farmer.” Rural Sociology 26(1961):39-48.

Fuller, A. M. and J. A. Mage, eds. Part-Time Farming: Problem or Resource in Rural Development.
Proc. First Rural Geography Symposium, University of Guelph, June 1975.

Galloway, Robert E. Part-Time Farming in Eastern Kentucky. University of Kentucky, Kentucky Agri.
Exp. Sta. Bull. 646, June 1956.

Gujarati, D. “Use of Dummy-Variables in Testing for Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two
Linear Regressions: A Note.”
Amer. Statis. (1970):50-52.

Hall, Bruce F., and Philip E. LeVeen. “Farm Size and Economic Efficiency: The Case of California,
Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):589-600.

66



More intriguing information

1. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
2. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
3. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
4. The name is absent
5. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
6. The name is absent
7. Job quality and labour market performance
8. Developments and Development Directions of Electronic Trade Platforms in US and European Agri-Food Markets: Impact on Sector Organization
9. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
10. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
11. Food Prices and Overweight Patterns in Italy
12. The name is absent
13. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
14. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
15. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
16. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
17. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan
18. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
19. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
20. A model-free approach to delta hedging