The name is absent



In summary, a crisis exists in a major part
of the United States agribusiness economy.
Conditions are most severe in business areas
that are directly or indirectly associated with
traditional row crop farm enterprises. Cur-
rent trends in the United States agricultural
trade balance indicate less United States par-
ticipation in world trade in each year except
one since 1981, Table 7. We know that sup-
ply and demand contribute to price deter-
mination. When the supply and demand of
United States agricultural products and re-
sources associated with the industry are
brought more nearly into balance, the agri-
cultural crisis will be over.

Table 7. Agricultural Trade Statistics, 1970-85

Marketing        Exports     Imports       Trade

Year           value       value       balance

.............. million dollars ...............

1970 ................... 6,958      5,686     + 1,272

1971 ................... 7,955      6,128     + 1,827

1972 ................... 8,242      5,936     + 2,306

1973 ...................14,984      7,737     + 7,247

1974 ...................21,559     10,031     +11,528

1975 ...................21,817      9,435     +12,382

1976 ...................22,742     10,497     +12,250

1977 ...................23,974     13,357     +10,617

1978 ...................27,289     13,886     +13,403

1979 ...................31,979     16,186     +15,793

1980 ...................40,481     17,276     +23,205

1981 ...................43,780     17,218     +26,562

1982 ...................39,095     15,489     +23,606

1983 ...................34,776     16,375     +18,401

1984 ...................38,013     18,910     +19,103

1985 (est.) ..........32,000     19,500     +12,500

Source: USDA (b).

REFERENCES

Government Accounting Office (GAO). Report to the Congress of the United States: Financial
Condition of Agriculture,
October 10, 1985.

U. S. Department of Agriculture (a). Crop Reporting Board and Statistical Reporting Service.
Farm Production Expenditures, 1983: Preliminary Summary, Washington, D. C.;
June, 1984.

(b). Agricultural Statistics, 1984-, U. S. Government Printing Office, Wash-
ington, D. C., 1984.

(c). Farmers Home Administration, Finance Office, unpublished materials,
form FmHA 389-375-A, national totals; September 30, 1985.

(d). Economic Research Service. Agricultural Outlook-, October, 1985.

(e). Economic Research Service. Economic Indicators of Farm Sector-, ρ.
3; December, 1985.

(f). Economic Research Service. Agricultural Resources: Inputs Outlook
Situation Report-,
No. AR-1; February, 1986.

108



More intriguing information

1. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?
2. Altruism and fairness in a public pension system
3. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
4. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
5. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES
6. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
7. The name is absent
8. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
9. From music student to professional: the process of transition
10. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
11. The name is absent
12. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department
13. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
14. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
15. The name is absent
16. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
17. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System