References
Capps, O., D.A. Bessler, G.C. Davis, J.P. Nichols, C.G. Anderson, and E.G. Smith. 1997. Economic
Evaluation of the Cotton Checkoff Program. Departmental Technical Report 97-2. College
Station: Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University.
Duffy, P.A., and M.K. Wohlgenant. 1991. “Effects of an Export Subsidy on the U.S. Cotton Industry.”
Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23:1-7.
Duffy, Patricia A., Kasazi Shalishali, and Henry W. Kinnucan. 1994. “Acreage Response Under Farm
Programs for Major Southeastern Field Crops.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
26(2): 1-7.
Duffy, P.A., M.K. Wohlgenant, and J.W. Richardson. 1990. “The Elasticity of Export Demand for U.S.
Cotton.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:468-474.
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2001. FRED. <http://www.stls.frb.org/fred>.
Hatanaka, M. 1976. “Several Efficient Two-Step Estimators for the Dynamic Simultaneous Equations
Model with Autoregressive Disturbances.” Journal of Econometrics 4:189-204.
Kinnucan, H., H. Xiao, and S. Yu. 2000. “Relative Effectiveness of USDA’s Nonprice Export
Promotion Instruments.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25:559-577.
Lenz, J., H.M. Kaiser, and C. Chung. 1998. “Economic Analysis of Generic Milk Advertising Impacts
on Markets in New York State.” Agribusiness 14(1):73-83.
Lowenstein, F. 1952. “Factors Affecting the Domestic Mill Consumption of Cotton.” Agricultural
Economics Research 4:44-51.
Murray, B.C., R.H. Beach, W.J. White, C. Viator, N.E. Piggott, and M.K. Wohlgenant. September 2001.
An Economic Analysis of the Cotton Research and Promotion Program. Report prepared for the
Cotton Board. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI.
National Cotton Council. EconCentral webpage <http://risk.cotton.org/prices/>. Obtained on September
27, 2001.
27
More intriguing information
1. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
5. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
6. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
7. The name is absent
8. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
9. Locke's theory of perception
10. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods