TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?



Goldar and Misra (2001) attribute much of the disparity to the familiar hypothetical bias
problem, and propose methods for reducing this bias. Kahneman and Tversky (1979) and others
note that individuals may value gains and losses differently. In this case, respondent behavior is
logical given loss aversion.

Zhao and Kling (2001) expand on the notion of uncertainty’s role in the difference. In
essence, they argue that respondents forced to make a decision on the spot demand
compensation for this loss of quasi-option value (Arrow and Fisher, 1974) in the case of WTA,
and produce WTP bids less than their expected value of the good so as to insure not
“overpaying.” Thus, in this framework, WTA bids are inflated by risk aversion while WTP bids
are deflated, thus increasing the WTA/WTP ratio. Zhao and Kling provide some mixed evidence
of this effect examining past studies, although empirical work is still needed. If their hypothesis
is true, efforts to collapse the WTA/WTP ratio would need to explicitly remove risk averting
behavior from the experiment. In addition, if the difference in ratios is indeed related to risk
managing behavior, acceptance of Zhao and Kling’s reasoning may preclude a Goldar-Misra
explanation, and vice versa.

Finally, Horowitz and McConnell (2000) provide evidence that the WTA/WTP ratio
increases or decreases depending on the type of good valued, as well as the respondent’s
familiarity with the good. Specifically, “non-ordinary” goods have significantly higher ratios than
ordinary (private) goods. Thus, one would expect a good such as police protection to have a
lower ratio than biodiversity.

Willingness to Accept: Why Ask?

List and Shogren (2002: 219-220) note that “the recent hypothetical valuation literature
has been driven by compensatory natural resource damage assessment, which is closely tied to



More intriguing information

1. The problem of anglophone squint
2. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
3. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know
4. The name is absent
5. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
6. The name is absent
7. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
8. The name is absent
9. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
10. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
11. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
12. The name is absent
13. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
14. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement
18. The name is absent
19. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
20. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?