BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES



institutional environment. More specifically, beginning in the mid-1990s, banking reforms
were initiated that provided banks incentives to allocate scarce financial resources to the
most productive uses: in essence, the reforms made banks independent, profit-driven units.
The impetus for such a move was likely engendered by the TVEs’ increased debt levels and
poor debt servicing behavior. Local governments began regarding TVEs with high levels of
debt as burdensome, and began to see the problem with not using market forces to discipline
TVE performance (Smyth, Wang, Kiang, 2001).

Another institutional detail of note relates to tax and fiscal reforms. With the local
government objectives noted above (labor and output goals, tax revenues), during the 1980s
TVEs were easier to tax and control than private enterprises, and hence, were the governance
structure of choice for the local governments. However, in 1994 China introduced major tax
and fiscal reforms. These reforms were more closely aligned with international practices and
strengthened the tax collection power of local governments (Qian, 1999). The reforms also
gave local governments more autonomy, but at the expense of increased fiscal responsibility
— as central government transfers to locals began to fall. The cut-back in central government
transfers forced the locals to become more self-sufficient, and the primary source of local
government funding became the tax revenues raised from TVEs and private enterprises. As
noted above, TVE revenues began to fall relative to private enterprises, and TVEs were much
worse at repaying debts than private enterprises. The combination of falling TVE profits/tax
revenues and poor TVE debt servicing led to a shift in bank and local government lending
preferences, with and private enterprises becoming the preferable institution (Smyth, Wang
and Kiang, 2001; Naughton, 1994).

Along with the improvement of governmental and market institutions, TVEs also lost
their relative advantage over private enterprises in getting scarce inputs, while retaining the
burden of meeting labor hiring and output targets.



More intriguing information

1. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
2. Cryothermal Energy Ablation Of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005: State Of The Art
3. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
4. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
5. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
6. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
7. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
8. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
9. Markets for Influence
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
16. On the Existence of the Moments of the Asymptotic Trace Statistic
17. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
18. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
19. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
20. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]