Table 2: Estimated Parameters for the Cotton and Peanut Supply Functions
|
VARIABLES |
COTTON |
PEANUTS | ||
|
Estimated Coefficients |
p-value |
Estimated Coefficients |
p-value | |
|
Intercept |
-50.72 |
.004249 |
.54 |
.271035 |
|
Lagged price |
1.39 |
.000198 |
.81 |
.000000 |
|
Rainfall |
3.69 |
.350197 |
.14 |
.001232 |
|
Acres Harvested |
.85 |
.000004 |
-.28 |
.000000 |
|
Input Costs |
-.68 |
.059431 |
-.43 |
.000000 |
|
Research Expenditures |
.25 |
.000001 |
.00065 |
.000000 |
|
R-square |
.7873 |
.9774 | ||
|
Durbin-Watson |
1.69 |
2.21 | ||
13
More intriguing information
1. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis2. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group
3. The name is absent
4. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
5. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
6. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department
7. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]
8. The name is absent
9. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
10. The name is absent