Table 2: Estimated Parameters for the Cotton and Peanut Supply Functions
VARIABLES |
COTTON |
PEANUTS | ||
Estimated Coefficients |
p-value |
Estimated Coefficients |
p-value | |
Intercept |
-50.72 |
.004249 |
.54 |
.271035 |
Lagged price |
1.39 |
.000198 |
.81 |
.000000 |
Rainfall |
3.69 |
.350197 |
.14 |
.001232 |
Acres Harvested |
.85 |
.000004 |
-.28 |
.000000 |
Input Costs |
-.68 |
.059431 |
-.43 |
.000000 |
Research Expenditures |
.25 |
.000001 |
.00065 |
.000000 |
R-square |
.7873 |
.9774 | ||
Durbin-Watson |
1.69 |
2.21 |
13
More intriguing information
1. Nonparametric cointegration analysis2. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
3. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
4. The name is absent
5. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
6. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
7. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
8. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa
9. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
10. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?