Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU



Table 2: Results of Monte Carlo simulations (n=2000)

coefficient

t-ratio

#

OEPUL program

mean

5%-limit

95%-limit

mean

5%-limit

95%-limit

1

Elementary support

0.037

0.005

0.069

1.65

0.21

3.11

2

Organic farming

-0.110

-0.145

-0.070

-4.38

-6.04

-2.65

3

Non-application of agro-chemicals, whole farm

-0.065

-0.117

-0.011

-1.79

-3.28

-0.29

4

Crop rotation measures

0.015

-0.008

0.037

0.99

-0.47

2.41

5

Extensive cereal cultivation

-0.119

-0.148

-0.090

-6.21

-7.69

-4.69

6

Non-application of growth regulators

-0.005

-0.029

0.021

-0.30

-1.75

1.18

7

Non-appl. easily sol. com. fert. & growth regulators

-0.039

-0.104

0.032

--0.80

-2.16

0.65

8

Non-appl. easily sol. com. fert. & synth. chem. Crop prot.

-0.028

-0.161

0.113

-0.29

-1.62

1.12

9

Non-application of fungicides

-0.016

-0.102

0.068

-0.27

-1.68

1.09

10

Non-application of synthetic chemical crop protection

-0.091

-0.258

0.068

-0.80

-2.28

0.59

hi, 1997 (no-OEPUL yields)

0.849

0.770

0.933

16.69

15.98

17.36

R2

0.35

0.34

0.36

12



More intriguing information

1. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
2. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
3. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
4. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION
5. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
9. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
10. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures