As depicted in Table 1 participation rates were highly unequal between programs,
ranging from a high of 93% for ‘elementary support’ to a low of under 1% for ‘non-
application of synthetic chemical crop protection agents’.
Table 1
As illustrated in Figure 1 most farms participate in more than one program and on
average in three programs:
Figure 1
In order to be able to compare yields of different kinds of grain (we looked at wheat,
rye, oats, barley), we constructed a index of relative yields for every farm in the following
way: relative yields of farm i for gain j (vij) is given by
i = 1, . . . , n farms, and j = wheat, rye, barley, oats,
where V is the absolute yield of farm i for grain j and V is the average yield for grain j over
all n farms. The relative yield of farm i over all j grains (vi) is given by
Vj
(1) vj = ɪ
v i i Vj
∑( √F∕)
(2) v. = 1 —:— , i = 1, . . . , n farms, and j = wheat, rye, barley, oats,
∑ Fi
j
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
3. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group
4. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
5. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
6. The name is absent
7. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
8. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
9. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
10. The name is absent