As depicted in Table 1 participation rates were highly unequal between programs,
ranging from a high of 93% for ‘elementary support’ to a low of under 1% for ‘non-
application of synthetic chemical crop protection agents’.
Table 1
As illustrated in Figure 1 most farms participate in more than one program and on
average in three programs:
Figure 1
In order to be able to compare yields of different kinds of grain (we looked at wheat,
rye, oats, barley), we constructed a index of relative yields for every farm in the following
way: relative yields of farm i for gain j (vij) is given by
i = 1, . . . , n farms, and j = wheat, rye, barley, oats,
where V is the absolute yield of farm i for grain j and V is the average yield for grain j over
all n farms. The relative yield of farm i over all j grains (vi) is given by
Vj
(1) vj = ɪ
v i i Vj
∑( √F∕)
(2) v. = 1 —:— , i = 1, . . . , n farms, and j = wheat, rye, barley, oats,
∑ Fi
j
More intriguing information
1. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)2. The name is absent
3. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
4. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
5. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
6. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
7. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
8. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
9. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
10. Keystone sector methodology:network analysis comparative study