Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU



As depicted in Table 1 participation rates were highly unequal between programs,
ranging from a high of 93% for ‘elementary support’ to a low of under 1% for ‘non-
application of synthetic chemical crop protection agents’.

Table 1

As illustrated in Figure 1 most farms participate in more than one program and on
average in three programs:

Figure 1

In order to be able to compare yields of different kinds of grain (we looked at wheat,
rye, oats, barley), we constructed a index of relative yields for every farm in the following
way: relative yields of farm
i for gain j (vij) is given by
i = 1, . . . , n farms, and j = wheat, rye, barley, oats,
where
V is the absolute yield of farm i for grain j and V is the average yield for grain j over
all
n farms. The relative yield of farm i over all j grains (vi) is given by

Vj

(1) vj = ɪ
v i i Vj


∑( √F∕)

(2) v. = 1  —:— , i = 1, . . . , n farms, and j = wheat, rye, barley, oats,

∑ Fi

j



More intriguing information

1. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
2. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time
3. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
4. The name is absent
5. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
6. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
7. The name is absent
8. Staying on the Dole
9. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
10. Institutions, Social Norms, and Bargaining Power: An Analysis of Individual Leisure Time in Couple Households