The name is absent



Stata Technical Bulletin

11


result of applying 3 an infinite number of times. R should only be used with odd-span smoothers, since even-span smoothers are
not guaranteed to converge.

The smoother 453R2 applies a span-4 smoother, followed by a span-5 smoother, followed by repeated applications of a
span-3 smoother, followed by a span-2 smoother.

End-point rule

The end-point rule E modifies the values z1 and according to the formulas:

Zi = median(3z2 — 2z3, zɪ, z2)

zjv = median(3zjv-2 — 2zjv-i, zʌ-, zjv-i)

When the end-point rule is not applied, end-points are typically “copied-in,” i.e., zɪ = г/i and = уы.

Splitting operator

The smoothers 3 and 3R can produce flat-topped hills and valleys. The split operator S is an attempt to eliminate such hills
and valleys by splitting the sequence, applying the end-point rule E, rejoining the series, and then resmoothing by 3R.

The S operator may be applied only after 3, 3R, or S.

It is recommended that the S operator be repeated once (SS) or until no further changes take place (SR).

Hanning smoother

H is the Hanning linear smoother zt = (yt-ι + 2yt + ⅜+ι)∕4. End points are copied in, zɪ = г/i and z^ = y^. H should
be applied only after all nonlinear smoothers.

Twicing

A smoother divides the data into a smooth and a rough; observed = smooth + rough. If the smoothing is successful, the
rough should exhibit no pattern. Twicing refers to applying the smoother to the observed, calculating the rough, and then applying
the smoother to the rough. The resulting “smoothed rough” is then added back to the smooth from the first step.

Examples

As a few examples of how nlsm can be used:

. nlsm 3 coalprdn, gen(smcp)

. nlsm 3r coalprdn, gen(smcp2)

. nlsm 3rss coalprdn, gen(smcp3)

. nlsm 3rssh3rssh3 coalprdn, gen(smcp4)

. nlsm 3rssh,twice coalprdn, gen(smcp5)

. nlsm 4253eh,twice gnp, gen(sgnp)

Certifications

nlsm has been tested on most of the examples provided in Tukey (1977) and produces identical results to those reported.
Salgado-Ugarte and Garcia (1992) provided in Table 1 the results of applying 4253EH to their length-frequency data. In comparison
to the results calculated by nlsm, the following differences were observed:

Standard body length

Frequency (individuals)

Ugarte-Garcia
smoothed values

nlsm

smoothed values

37

6

6.0000

.

38

10

6.0000

6.7500

39

3

6.0000

6.3125

40

7

6.0000

6.0625

41

5

6.0000

6.0000

42

9

5.9375

5.9375

For the remaining lengths 43-67, there were no differences in the results, so results were identical for lengths 41-67; only results
for the first four lengths differ. The difference in the first observation is due to a difference of implementation; Ugarte-Garcia



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
3. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
4. Evaluating the Impact of Health Programmes
5. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
9. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
10. The name is absent
11. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
12. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
13. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
14. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
15. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
16. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
17. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent