Annexure 3: SPM abatement, total and marginal costs
(Base-case scenario)
Source |
Volumetric |
Norms for SPM |
SPM |
χ |
Total cost of SPM |
Marginal | |
1 |
Sinter plant (exhaust) |
22259102.0 |
150 |
31.56 |
1.94 |
443.69 |
2725.3 |
2 |
Sinter Plant (discharge) |
17800358.0 |
150 |
25.24 |
1.94 |
354.82 |
2725.3 |
3 |
Kiln |
17046771.2 |
150 |
98.55 |
1.54 |
151.28 |
236.8 |
4 |
SMS |
25870176.0 |
400 |
84.72 |
1.83 |
807.75 |
1740.4 |
5 |
TPP |
32719660.8 |
150 |
972.04 |
1.24 |
328.96 |
42.1 |
6 |
CPP |
30833912.0 |
150 |
581.28 |
1.38 |
562.67 |
133.4 |
7 |
Blast Furnace |
45937437.7 |
150 |
56.50 |
1.73 |
207.04 |
632.9 |
__________Total_________ |
1849.90 |
2856.21 |
xviii
More intriguing information
1. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities2. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
3. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
4. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
5. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset
6. The name is absent
7. Auction Design without Commitment
8. The name is absent
9. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
10. The name is absent