A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation



set (such as land territories and natural resources) or (tangible and intangible) the stock of
durables. We want our model to capture the role of productive and aggressive activities with
the understanding that aggressive investment causes an inward shift of the aggregate produc-
tion possibility frontier. Accordingly, we use a setup where appropriation and production are
two substitutable investment choices. Specifically, let an individual decide at each point in
time how much resources to devote for appropriation
ai 0 and production li 0. The
individual resource (e.g. time) constraint is:

ai + li = ei,                                               (1)

where ei is the endowment of a fill-in activity that is not subject to appropriation.4 We will
set
ei =1 for ease of exposition. The time arguments have been suppressed in this and all
subsequent equations.

The common-pool stock is subject to appropriation. The stock is generated by accumula-
tion of output. Output is produced with a linear production technology:

n

Y(l1,...,ln)=     lj,                                         (2)

j=1

which captures the idea that higher productive efforts by agents cause an outward shift of
the production possibility frontier for the economy as a whole. The output of production can
be stored to augment the common-pool stock. However, storage entails costs such that the
stock
Z evolves according to

Z = Y(lι,...,ln) - δZ,                                (3)

where δ (0,1) is the rate at which output will depreciate if stored for future consumption, Zi
denotes the change of Z over time and Z (0) 0 is the initial stock.

A main ingredient of the model is the conflict technology which, for any given values
of
a1 ,...,an, determines each agent’s probability of winning sole possession in obtaining the

4 The standard assumption that each agent has some essential property rights is implicit in this formulation.
Individual’s labor supply is such an example. Maxwell and Reuveny (2005) further assume that labor supply
is growing over time as a result of the growth of population. However, in order to keep the model simple, we
assume that the population of agents remains constant over time.



More intriguing information

1. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
2. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
3. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
4. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach
5. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)
6. 03-01 "Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts - The Distributional Impacts of Repealing Dividend Taxation"
7. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
8. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
9. The name is absent
10. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
11. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
12. The name is absent
13. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
14. The name is absent
15. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
16. The name is absent
17. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
18. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
19. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
20. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology