provided by Research Papers in Economics
THE ULTIMATE DETERMINANTS OF
CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE
by
Sylvester Eijffinger and Eric Schaling
Department of Economics and CentER for Economic Research,
Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
Paper Prepared for the CentER Conference
‘Positive Political Economy: Theory and Evidence’, January 23-24, 1995,
Tilburg, The Netherlands
Abstract
Using a graphical method, a new way of determining the optimal degree of central bank
conservativeness is developed in this paper. Unlike Lohmann (1992) and Rogoff (1985),
we are able to express the upper and lower bounds of the interval containing the optimal
degree of conservativeness in terms of the structural parameters of the model.
Next, we show that optimal central bank independence is higher, the higher the natural
rate of unemployment, the greater the benefits of unanticipated inflation, the less inflation-
averse society, and the smaller the variance of productivity shocks. These propositions are
tested for nineteen industrial countries (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark,
Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States) for the post-
Bretton-Woods period (1960-1993). In testing the model we employ a latent variables
method (LISREL) in order to distinguish between actual and optimal monetary regimes.
More intriguing information
1. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes2. The name is absent
3. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
4. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
5. The name is absent
6. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
7. Informal Labour and Credit Markets: A Survey.
8. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
9. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
10. Keystone sector methodology:network analysis comparative study