The ultimate determinants of central bank independence



17

"That interest in such models had to be restimulated at all may seem surprising", in the
opinion of Aigner et al., "since there can be no doubt that economic quantities frequently
are measured with error and, moreover, that many applications depend on the use of
observable proxies for otherwise unobservable conceptual variables" (p. 1323).

Estimation of a simultaneous equations model with latent variables can be done by means
of a computer program for the analysis of covariance structures, such a LISREL (Linear
Structural Relations). The idea behind LISREL is to compare a sample covariance matrix
with the parametric structure imposed on it by the hypothesized model. Under normality,
LISREL delivers
Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) estimates of the model
parameters. Because of its general availability, LISREL is the most important tool for
handling latent variables.

The specification of the latent variables model to be analyzed by LISREL is as fol-
lows.13) Let
η be the latent dependent variable, i.e. the latent optimal degree of central
bank independence, and
ξ be the latent explanatory variables, in our case the four ultimate
determinants of central bank independence, satisfying a system of linear structural
relations

η =B ∙ ξ + ζ,                                                                     (4.2)

with B being the coefficient matrix and ζ the disturbances. It is assumed that η, ξ and ζ
have zero expectations, and that ξ and ζ are uncorrelated. Instead of the latent vectors η
and ξ, the vectors y and x are observed, such that

y = Λy ∙ η + γ                                                                     (4.3)

and

x = Λχ ∙ ξ + δ,                                                                        (4.4)

with Λy and Λx the coefficient matrices, and γ and δ the vectors of measurement errors,
uncorrelated with η, ξ, ζ and each other, but possibly correlated among themselves. The
observed vectors y and x are measured as deviations form their means, thus, having
zero
expectations and a covariance equal to E[x y]. This implies, of course, that γ and δ have

13) In order to avoid overlapping symbols between sections II and III (theoretical model) and section IV
(latent variables model), our notation differs from that of the LISREL manual. Having one latent
dependent variable, we use B and
γ, respectively, instead of the symbols Γ and ɛ for the LISREL
manual. Compare also Aigner et al. (1984, pp. 1370-1371) in this respect.



More intriguing information

1. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
2. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
3. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
4. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
5. The name is absent
6. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
7. The name is absent
8. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
9. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
10. The name is absent
11. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
12. New urban settlements in Belarus: some trends and changes
13. The name is absent
14. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
15. The name is absent
16. The economic doctrines in the wine trade and wine production sectors: the case of Bastiat and the Port wine sector: 1850-1908
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
20. The name is absent