The ultimate determinants of central bank independence



17

"That interest in such models had to be restimulated at all may seem surprising", in the
opinion of Aigner et al., "since there can be no doubt that economic quantities frequently
are measured with error and, moreover, that many applications depend on the use of
observable proxies for otherwise unobservable conceptual variables" (p. 1323).

Estimation of a simultaneous equations model with latent variables can be done by means
of a computer program for the analysis of covariance structures, such a LISREL (Linear
Structural Relations). The idea behind LISREL is to compare a sample covariance matrix
with the parametric structure imposed on it by the hypothesized model. Under normality,
LISREL delivers
Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) estimates of the model
parameters. Because of its general availability, LISREL is the most important tool for
handling latent variables.

The specification of the latent variables model to be analyzed by LISREL is as fol-
lows.13) Let
η be the latent dependent variable, i.e. the latent optimal degree of central
bank independence, and
ξ be the latent explanatory variables, in our case the four ultimate
determinants of central bank independence, satisfying a system of linear structural
relations

η =B ∙ ξ + ζ,                                                                     (4.2)

with B being the coefficient matrix and ζ the disturbances. It is assumed that η, ξ and ζ
have zero expectations, and that ξ and ζ are uncorrelated. Instead of the latent vectors η
and ξ, the vectors y and x are observed, such that

y = Λy ∙ η + γ                                                                     (4.3)

and

x = Λχ ∙ ξ + δ,                                                                        (4.4)

with Λy and Λx the coefficient matrices, and γ and δ the vectors of measurement errors,
uncorrelated with η, ξ, ζ and each other, but possibly correlated among themselves. The
observed vectors y and x are measured as deviations form their means, thus, having
zero
expectations and a covariance equal to E[x y]. This implies, of course, that γ and δ have

13) In order to avoid overlapping symbols between sections II and III (theoretical model) and section IV
(latent variables model), our notation differs from that of the LISREL manual. Having one latent
dependent variable, we use B and
γ, respectively, instead of the symbols Γ and ɛ for the LISREL
manual. Compare also Aigner et al. (1984, pp. 1370-1371) in this respect.



More intriguing information

1. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
2. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
3. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
4. The name is absent
5. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
6. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
10. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax