Altruism and fairness in a public pension system



12

the weighting factors with regard to gender and age have been calculated so that they correspond to
those of the population.

One of the purposes of the research was to detect whether altruism or fairness plays a role in the
evaluation of the public pension system. We tested for the effects of these variables by estimating
different specifications of eqs. (3) where the differences are due to the inclusion or exclusion of
variables that might deal with feelings of altruism and fairness. Table 4.4 presents for 9 variants the
estimated coefficients for the younger generation by means of WLS regression.

[ INSERT TABLE 4.4 ABOUT HERE ]

Obviously, the income position of the respondents themselves (Kj) plays a key role in the evaluation
of the pension system. It is significant and positive in all variants considered. Further, it is rather robust.
Its average value amounts to 1.38.

The introduction of altruism (measured via income of others) and / or fairness (measured via the rate
of return) improves the explanatory power of the equation considerably. In particular, adding altruism
(variant 1) or altruism and the rate of return for the young themselves (variant 3) doubles or triples
the explanatory power. Adding next rates of returns for other generations leads to problems regarding
the statistical significance of the variables and/or their signs (compare e.g. variant 3 with variant 5).
The generation’s own income gives a larger contribution to utility than income of other generations.
Incorporating both the fairness terms with respect to the elderly (rʃ and r0y2) and the income of other
generations
(Ym +Y0s, results in a negative sign for the latter variable. In particular, these statistical
results are due to the fact that the fairness terms for the middle-aged, the fairness terms for the elderly
and
Ym are0 are strongly correlated. So, the size and / or the significance of variables measuring
altruism and fairness is affected by the specification. When all rates of return are included (variant 4)
fairness turns out to be completely insignificant which, as noted before, is probably due to
multicollinearity problems. The same problems make it empirically impossible to include all the rates
of return and the income of other generations at the same time in the regression equation (variant 8).
On the other hand, the fact that it is difficult to discriminate between altruism and fairness also indicates
that individuals do not clearly separate altruistic feelings from notions of fairness. From the estimated
coefficients we have derived the elasticities of altruism and fairness. The elasticity of altruism, which



More intriguing information

1. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
2. The name is absent
3. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
4. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
5. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
6. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
7. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
8. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
9. The name is absent
10. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
11. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
12. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
17. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
18. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
19. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
20. International Financial Integration*