Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8:45
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/8/45

15. Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley
A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's
views: an example from public health. J Epidemiol Community
Health 2004, 58:794-800.

16. Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A: Young People, Pregnancy
and Social Exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify
effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support
2006 [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=674]. London:
EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education,
University of London

17. Thomas J, Sutcliffe K, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Rees R, Brunton
G, Kavanagh J: Children and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of barriers
and facilitators 2003 [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/
Default.aspx?tabid=246]. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science
Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London accessed
4^th July 2008

18. Thomas J, Kavanagh J, Tucker H, Burchett H, Tripney J, Oakley A:
Accidental Injury, Risk-Taking Behaviour and the Social Circumstances in
which Young People Live: A systematic review 2007 [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/
cms/Default.aspx?tabid= 1910]. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science
Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London

19. Bryman A: Quantity and Quality in Social Research London: Unwin;
1998.

20. Hammersley M: What's Wrong with Ethnography? London: Routledge;
1992.

21. Harden A, Thomas J: Methodological issues in combining
diverse study types in systematic reviews. Int J Soc Res Meth
2005, 8:257-271.

22. Oakley A: Experiments in Knowing: Gender and methods in the social sci-
ences Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000.

23. Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S: Peer-delivered health promotion
for young people: a systematic review of different study
designs. Health Educ J 2001, 60:339-353.

24. Harden A, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oliver S, Oakley A: Young
People and Mental Health: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
2001 [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=256]. London:
EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education,
University of London

25. Rees R, Harden A, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oliver S, Oakley A: Young
People and Physical Activity: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
2001   [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=260]. London:

EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education,
University of London

26. Shepherd J, Harden A, Rees R, Brunton G, Oliver S, Oakley A: Young
People and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
2001 [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=258]. London:
EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education,
University of London

27. Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Brunton
G, Kavanagh J: Integrating qualitative research with trials in
systematic reviews: an example from public health. BMJ 2004,
328:1010-1012.

28. Davies P: What is evidence-based education? Br J Educ Stud
1999, 47:108-121.

29. Newman M, Thompson C, Roberts AP: Helping practitioners
understand the contribution of qualitative research to evi-
dence-based practice. Evid Based Nurs 2006, 9:4-7.

30. Popay J: Moving Beyond Effectiveness in Evidence Synthesis London:
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.

31. Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies
Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.

32. Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using
meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a
worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002, 7:209-215.

33. Paterson B, Thorne S, Canam C, Jillings C: Meta-Study of Qualitative
Health Research Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 2001.

34. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Har-
vey J, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton AJ: Conducting
a critical interpretative synthesis of the literature on access
to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol
2006, 6:35.

35. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A: Synthesis-
ing qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possi-
ble methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005, 10:45-53.

36. Boyatzis RE: Transforming Qualitative Information Sage: Cleveland; 1998.

37. Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual
Res Psychol 2006, 3:77-101 [http://science.uwe.ac.uk/psychology/
drvictoriaclarke files/thematicanalysis%20.pdf].

38. Silverman D, Ed: Qualitative Research: Theory, method and practice Lon-
don: Sage; 1997.

39. Doyle LH: Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes,
enhancements, and possibilities. Qual Res 2003, 3:321-344.

40. Barroso J, Gollop C, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ:
The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative
studies. Western J Nurs Res 2003, 25:153-178.

41. Walters LA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges Team: Developing
optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant
qualitative studies in EMBASE. Qual Health Res 2006, 16:162-8.

42. Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB: Developing optimal
search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative
studies in Medline. Medinfo 2004, 11:311-314.

43. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualita-
tive research methods in health technology assessment: a
review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2(16):.

44. Seale C: Quality in qualitative research. Qual Inq 1999,
5:465-478.

45. Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L: Quality in Qualitative Evaluation:
A framework for assessing research evidence London: Cabinet Office;
2003.

46. Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C: Qualitative research in
healthcare II: a structured review and evaluation of studies.
J Eval Clin Pract 1996, 2:171-179.

47. Cobb A, Hagemaster J: Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative
research proposals. J Nurs Educ 1987, 26:138-143.

48. Mays N, Pope C: Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995,
311:109-12.

49. Medical Sociology Group: Criteria for the evaluation of qualita-
tive research papers. Med Sociol News 1996, 22:68-71.

50. Alderson P: Listening to Children London: Barnardo's; 1995.

51. Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D: Systematic Reviews in Health Care:
Meta-analysis in context London: BMJ Publishing; 2001.

52. Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Finding the findings in qualitative
studies. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002, 34:213-219.

53. Sandelowski M: Using qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2004,
14:1366-1386.

54. Thomas J, Brunton J: EPPI-Reviewer 3.0: Analysis and management of
data for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre software London: EPPI-Centre,
Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education; 2006.

55. Fisher M, Qureshi H, Hardyman W, Homewood J: Using Qualitative
Research in Systematic Reviews: Older people's views of hospital discharge
London: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2006.

56. Dixey R, Sahota P, Atwal S, Turner A: Children talking about
healthy eating: data from focus groups with 300 9-1 1-year-
olds. Nutr Bull 2001, 26:71-79.

57. Daly A, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E: Hier-
archy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J
Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:43-49.

58. Popay J: Moving beyond floccinaucinihilipilification: enhancing
the utility of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005,
58:1079-80.

59. Strike K, Posner G: Types of synthesis and their criteria. In
Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation
Edited by: Ward S, Reed L. Philadelphia: Temple University Press;
1983.

60. Marston C, King E: Factors that shape young people's sexual
behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet 2006, 368:1581-86.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed
here:

http://www.biomedc.entraLc.om/1471-2288/8/45/prepub

Page 10 of 10

(page number not for citation purposes)

<<   7   8   9   10  

More intriguing information