The condition for xM - xE > 0 is (Fi + b(y* - yi )λλbν2d + c2 П (bθG - dθβ )]>0 which is
also fulfilled as long as (bθ G - dθB )>0. Again, because there is no seigniorage, siE -siM
0.
Proof of Result 4:
The condition for xiA -xiM >0 is that
λθBν2 ɪ (Fi + b(y* - yi ))(λdν2 + c2 T-)>n ∑j (xA + (y* - yj fλd + θG)λννν2+ c2ω ).
The condition for siA -siM >0 is that
(Fi + b (y * - y. )λθεV n-1 (dθβ — b ~)> ɪ Σ (xA + (y * — У )λν,ν2 + c∖dθβ - b θG-). Notice that
i i i 2n n n j j j j 12 2 n
if (nbθG - dθB )>0 the inequality reverses its sign. Hence, the comparison about structural
reforms depends not only on the distortions of country i vis-à-vis the average of the other
countries but also on the size of d.
24
More intriguing information
1. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION2. Searching Threshold Inflation for India
3. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
4. Evolutionary Clustering in Indonesian Ethnic Textile Motifs
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
8. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
9. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
10. The name is absent