CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM



Table 8. Indonesia’s regional macroeconomic variables (% change from base case)

______________________________________West Java______________

__________Rest of Indonesia__________

Oil productivity

Trade price

Total

Oil productivity

Trade
price

Total

H’hold consumption

-1.31

1.97

0.66

-1.23

1.45

0.22

Investment

-0.58

-4.53

-5.10

-0.53

-4.44

-4.97

Govt consumption

0

0

0

0

0

0

Export Volumes

-1.76

-7.04

-8.80

-1.75

-5.37

-7.12

Import volumes

-0.64

-1.76

-2.40

-0.74

-0.93

-1.67

Real GDP

-1.76

-0.67

-2.43

-1.19

-0.97

-2.16

Employment

-0.01

0.06

0.06

0.00

-0.01

-0.01

Avg real wage

-0.34

-3.62

-3.96

-0.33

-3.69

-4.02

Capital stocks

-1.03

-1.35

-2.38

-0.93

-1.86

-2.79

Export price index

0.09

16.28

16.36

0.05

17.91

17.97

Import price index

_________0.00

5.12

5.12

0.00

8.93

8.93

Table 8 shows the regional results of the simulation. Recall that the present version of
IndoTERM contains only two regions, West Java and the rest of Indonesia. This
representation results in two regions that are relatively similar, as a large proportion of
the composite region consists of the remaining provinces of Java. These have similar
endowments to West Java, unlike the relatively sparsely populated outer islands that are
relatively rich in mineral resources. With representation of such provinces individually,
we would expect to find significant differences between the macroeconomic changes
between regions.

Table 9. Industry national outputs, Indonesia (% change from base case)

_______Oil productivity

Trade price

Total______

Natural Gas

0.06

10.12

10.18

Private Health

-1.5

2.86

1.36

Private Educat

-1.46

2.53

1.07

Poultry Prd

-0.97

2.02

1.06

Restaurant

-0.89

1.81

0.92

Films

-0.57

1.46

0.89

PersHousSvc

-1.4

2.24

0.85

Hotel

-0.13

0.97

0.84

Animal Feed

-0.69

1.38

0.69

RecCultSvcPr

-0.66

1.32

0.66

Clay Cer Struc

1.51

-12.91

-11.4

Communic Equp

1.93

-13.45

-11.52

Plastcs Fibre

0.72

-13.04

-12.31

Iron Ore

0.36

-12.75

-12.39

Oth Chemicals

-0.12

-13.98

-14.1

Scientif Equp

1.68

-15.79

-14.11

Bas Ferr Prd

0.53

-15.99

-15.47

Sport Goods

1.88

-18.52

-16.64

Basic Ferrous

0.66

-18.23

-17.56

Oth Trans Equp_______

_______________1.52

-21.13

-19.61

The biggest winners and losers at the national industry level are shown in table 9. Natural
gas is the biggest winner, due to the doubling of the export price and the absence of any

14



More intriguing information

1. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
2. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
3. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
4. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
5. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
6. The name is absent
7. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
8. The name is absent
9. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
10. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
11. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
12. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
13. International Financial Integration*
14. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
15. The name is absent
16. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
17. Multiple Arrhythmogenic Substrate for Tachycardia in a
18. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
19. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
20. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior