CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM



Table 8. Indonesia’s regional macroeconomic variables (% change from base case)

______________________________________West Java______________

__________Rest of Indonesia__________

Oil productivity

Trade price

Total

Oil productivity

Trade
price

Total

H’hold consumption

-1.31

1.97

0.66

-1.23

1.45

0.22

Investment

-0.58

-4.53

-5.10

-0.53

-4.44

-4.97

Govt consumption

0

0

0

0

0

0

Export Volumes

-1.76

-7.04

-8.80

-1.75

-5.37

-7.12

Import volumes

-0.64

-1.76

-2.40

-0.74

-0.93

-1.67

Real GDP

-1.76

-0.67

-2.43

-1.19

-0.97

-2.16

Employment

-0.01

0.06

0.06

0.00

-0.01

-0.01

Avg real wage

-0.34

-3.62

-3.96

-0.33

-3.69

-4.02

Capital stocks

-1.03

-1.35

-2.38

-0.93

-1.86

-2.79

Export price index

0.09

16.28

16.36

0.05

17.91

17.97

Import price index

_________0.00

5.12

5.12

0.00

8.93

8.93

Table 8 shows the regional results of the simulation. Recall that the present version of
IndoTERM contains only two regions, West Java and the rest of Indonesia. This
representation results in two regions that are relatively similar, as a large proportion of
the composite region consists of the remaining provinces of Java. These have similar
endowments to West Java, unlike the relatively sparsely populated outer islands that are
relatively rich in mineral resources. With representation of such provinces individually,
we would expect to find significant differences between the macroeconomic changes
between regions.

Table 9. Industry national outputs, Indonesia (% change from base case)

_______Oil productivity

Trade price

Total______

Natural Gas

0.06

10.12

10.18

Private Health

-1.5

2.86

1.36

Private Educat

-1.46

2.53

1.07

Poultry Prd

-0.97

2.02

1.06

Restaurant

-0.89

1.81

0.92

Films

-0.57

1.46

0.89

PersHousSvc

-1.4

2.24

0.85

Hotel

-0.13

0.97

0.84

Animal Feed

-0.69

1.38

0.69

RecCultSvcPr

-0.66

1.32

0.66

Clay Cer Struc

1.51

-12.91

-11.4

Communic Equp

1.93

-13.45

-11.52

Plastcs Fibre

0.72

-13.04

-12.31

Iron Ore

0.36

-12.75

-12.39

Oth Chemicals

-0.12

-13.98

-14.1

Scientif Equp

1.68

-15.79

-14.11

Bas Ferr Prd

0.53

-15.99

-15.47

Sport Goods

1.88

-18.52

-16.64

Basic Ferrous

0.66

-18.23

-17.56

Oth Trans Equp_______

_______________1.52

-21.13

-19.61

The biggest winners and losers at the national industry level are shown in table 9. Natural
gas is the biggest winner, due to the doubling of the export price and the absence of any

14



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Insurance within the firm
5. The name is absent
6. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
7. The name is absent
8. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
9. Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria
10. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms