The name is absent



reduced the net export tax, should have led to an increase in exports and, as foreign importers
moved down their demand curve, a slight decrease in Brazil’s nominal export price.18 Without
specific analysis, it is impossible to determine whether the coffee export tax was set at the
economically optimal level, though casual analysis suggests that Brazil’s coffee export tax was
generally set too high as there has been a large erosion of its market share over time. Assuming
that the export tax was too high, the use of the export tax rebate may have been welfare
improving. However, it would have been more efficient to simply reduce the export tax.

If these broad characterizations are correct, Brazil’s payment of an export tax rebate is
likely to have had a significantly negative welfare impact only during the 1980-88 period.
During 1965-71, the export tax rebates probably led to an expansion of exports to the member
market and this expansion may have achieved benefits that exceeded the cost of the
avisos
issued. Regardless, the export tax rebates issued totaled only $220 million and any transfer of
rents would have been small. Assuming benefits from expanded exports of about $40 million per
year, Brazil’s welfare was probably not significantly affected during this period of time. During
1972-79, Brazil issued $1.8 billion in
avisos. These export tax rebates reduced Brazil’s tax
revenues (assuming that the export tax was not adjusted), but according to theory the tax rebates
should not have significantly affected Brazil’s nominal coffee export price and could even have
improved its economic welfare. During 1980-88, however, I believe the harmful effect of the
export tax rebates was large. Brazil issued more than $6 billion in
avisos during this short period
and, since the export tax did not constrain exports during this period, the
avisos had no effect on
member market export volume. Brazil thus lost heavily unless importers bid up the nominal
export price by the full amount of the unit export tax rebate.

Econometric Model. Brazil’s domestic coffee export price data are considered

18 The primary effect of the rebates in this situation is to increase the price paid to farmers and thus expand exports.

15



More intriguing information

1. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
2. Workforce or Workfare?
3. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
4. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
5. The name is absent
6. Long-Term Capital Movements
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Portuguese Women in Science and Technology (S&T): Some Gender Features Behind MSc. and PhD. Achievement
10. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
11. The name is absent
12. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
13. Empirically Analyzing the Impacts of U.S. Export Credit Programs on U.S. Agricultural Export Competitiveness
14. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
15. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
16. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
17. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
18. The name is absent
19. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
20. The name is absent