Lemma 4: Under Assumption B, the set Mt = {m ∈ Rj : ç(m)2 = θ} has Lebesgue
measure zero a.s.
Theorem 2 next, demonstrates the limit properties of the B (m) test statistic under
the null and the alternative hypothesis.
Theorem 2: Suppose that Assumptions A-B hold. Then, for any m ∈ Rj∖ (M U M,),
as n → ∞ :
(i) UnderH0:
B(m) → y2,
(ii) UnderH 1:
B(m)∕^n → c(m),
with c(m) > 0 a.s.
In view of Theorem 2, the function c(m) can be zero only on sets of Lebesgue measure
zero. Therefore, consistency can be achieved by choosing m from a continuous distri-
bution. A consistent test of functional form based on randomised m is proposed by
Bierens (1987). Alternatively, a consistent test can be based on an appropriate func-
tional of B(m). By virtue of Theorem 1, in the limit the numerator of the I?(m) can
be zero only on null sets. Hence, any compact non-trivial subset of Rj contains some
m* such that c(m*) > 0. An obvious choice for m* is the maximiser of B(m) over some
compact set of positive Lebesgue measure. This is exactly the approach advocated
by Bierens (1990). Following Bierens (1990), we consider the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
functional of ]3(m):
sup B(m), (6)
mEM
where M is a compact subset of Rj.
Next, the limit properties of the sup-statistic are explored. Assumption B ensures
that a test statistic based on randomised m is well defined in the limit. Nonethe-
less, to ensure that the test statistic of (6) is well defined asymptotically, a stronger
assumption is required:
Assumption B': infto∈m ç(m)2 > 0 a.s.
Theorem 2 essentially follows from the asymptotic theory of Park and Phillips (2001).
To obtain the limit distribution of the sup-statistic however, further limit results are
required. First, we need some additional assumption about the covariates of the
model:
Assumption C: The process, t 1∕2xj∙,t, 1 ≤ f ≤ J has density function dj,t(x) that
is uniformly bounded2 i.e. supt>1 supæ dj,t(x) < ∞.
2By Lemma 3.1 in Potscher (2004), the following requirement is sufficient for Assumption C: η^t
has characteristic function φ^(r) such that lim,. ..ɪ |r|Æ φ^(r) = 0, for some ð > 1.
10
More intriguing information
1. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes2. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
3. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
7. The name is absent
8. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
9. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
10. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online