The name is absent



Next, we specify the test hypothesis. Under the null hypothesis, all the fitted
components
gj (xj ,aj), 1 jJ are correctly specified. In particular, we say that
a fitted component is correctly specified, if the function
gj(.,aj) differs from its true
counterpart (i.e.
fj(.)) on a set of Lebesgue measure zero at most. This is formally
stated below:

Definition 1.

H0 : (correct specification) For all 1 j J,

ʌ [{∙s : fj(s) = gj(s,ao,j)}] = o,

for a some αθιj Aj.

H1 : (incorrect specification) For some 1 j J,

ʌ[{s : fj(s) = gj(s,aj)}] >o,

for all αj Aj∙.

Clearly, our formulation of the test hypothesis is in general different than that
of Bierens (1990). Nevertheless, if the covariate
xt has certain properties, the two
approaches are equivalent. First, notice that under (1), the null hypothesis that
appears in (4) can written as

H0 : P [f (xt) = g(xt, a)] = 1, for a some ao A.

The following lemma shows that the two approaches are equivalent, under certain
conditions.

Lemma 1. Let q(.) : Rj R be Borel measurable.

(i) If the random variable x has absolutely continuous distribution with respect to
the Lebesgue measure, then:

ʌ[s Rj : q(s) = 0] = O ^ P[q(x) = 0] = 1.

(ii) If P[x D] > 0 for all Borel sets D of positive Lebesgue measure, then:

P[q(x) = 0] = 1 ^ ʌ[s Rj : q(s) = 0] = 0.

In view of Lemma 1 and setting q(.) = f (.) g(., ao), the result follows. Notice that
condition (i) of Lemma 1 requires that the covariates are continuously distributed.
This is one of the maintained assumptions of the paper (Assumption A above), which
is also a standard assumption in the literature e.g. Park and Phillips (1999, 2001),
Jeganathan (2003), Pbtscher (2004), de Jong (2004), de Jong and Wang (2005). On
the other hand, condition (ii) essentially requires that the covariates are unrestricted.
Clearly, it rules out bounded random variables. Condition (ii) can be easily checked



More intriguing information

1. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
2. The name is absent
3. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
7. The name is absent
8. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
9. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
10. Unemployment in an Interdependent World