entry, 34 percent eventually graduate whereas only 8 percent of low socioeconomic
status students who delayed graduated. These findings led the Department of Education
researchers to conclude:” knowing that a decision to delay entry .. .can mean the chances
of getting a bachelor’s degree are five times lower than they would be if the student
started on track should result in better decisions by high school seniors.” (US Department
of Education 1989:29).1
The data from the Department of Education suggests caution before
recommending a year off before college. An additional reason for institutions to be
concerned about students delaying entry is that there is a growing use of institutional
graduation rates as a measure of accountability and a tendency to blame colleges for the
failure of students to graduate or to graduate in a timely manner (Adelman 1999).
The college wage premium rose to an unprecedented level in the 1980’s (Bound
and Johnson, 1989; Murphy and Welch, 1993; Brewer, Eide, and Ehrenberg, 1999).
College graduates have twice the earnings and two and one- half times the wealth of high
school graduates.(Diaz-Gimenz, Quadrini, and Rios-Rull, 1997). Thus, to the extent that
delaying college attendance after graduating high school lowers the amount of post-
1A similar conclusion can be drawn from the recent analysis of the High School and Beyond/Sophomore
1982 cohort. Fully 51 percent of those who did not delay entry to college earned a bachelor’s degree while
only 20 percent of those who delayed seven to 18 months and ten percent of those who delayed more than
18 months earned a bachelor’s degree (Adelman 1999:45).
More intriguing information
1. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE2. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
10. The name is absent