The name is absent



л                л л

i t.h /1 = c^+ri t.

We include the VAR forecasts for completeness, although one might expect them to be inferior to the AR
forecasts for at least two reasons. First, as is well-known from the macroeconomics literature,
unrestricted VARs tend to produce poor forecasts of economic variables even when there is important
cross-variable interaction, due to the large number of included parameters and the resulting potential for
in-sample overfitting.13 Second, our factors indeed display little cross-factor interaction and are not
highly correlated, so that an appropriate multivariate model is likely close to a stacked set of univariate
models.

In Figure 8 (right column) we provide some evidence on the goodness of fit of the AR(1) models
fit to the estimated level, slope and curvature factors, showing residual autocorrelation functions. The
autocorrelations are very small, indicating that the models accurately describe the conditional means of
level, slope and curvature .
Out-of-Sample Forecasting Performance of the Three-Factor Model

A good approximation to yield-curve dynamics should not only fit well in-sample, but also
forecast well out-of-sample. Because the yield curve depends only on {
f1t, β2t, β3t}, forecasting the yield
curve is equivalent to forecasting {β1
t, β2t, 33t}. In this section we undertake just such a forecasting
exercise. We estimate and forecast recursively, using data from 1985:1 to the time that the forecast is
made, beginning in 1994:1 and extending through 2000:12.

In Tables 4-6 we compare h -month-ahead out-of sample forecasting results from Nelson-Siegel
models to those of several natural competitors, for maturities of 3, 12, 36, 60 and 120 months, and
forecast horizons of
h = 1, 6 and 12 months. Let us now describe the competitors in terms of how their
forecasts are generated.

(1) Random walk:

yt+h /1 (τ) = y( (τ).

The forecast is always “no change.”’

(2) Slope regression:

13 That, of course, is the reason for the ubiquitous use of Bayesian analysis, featuring strong
priors on the VAR coefficients, for VAR forecasting, as pioneered by Doan, Litterman and Sims (1984).

11



More intriguing information

1. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
2. The name is absent
3. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
4. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
5. The name is absent
6. An Investigation of transience upon mothers of primary-aged children and their school
7. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
8. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
9. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
10. The name is absent
11. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
12. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
13. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
14. The name is absent
15. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
16. The name is absent
17. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
18. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
19. Importing Feminist Criticism
20. The name is absent