for q< 1. Therefore, more capital increases consumer surplus.
We proceed in two stages, starting by maximizing CS with respect to the loan’s price,
rL ,forafixed k , which yields
∂CS
∂r L
dq ∖
∂rL (R — rL)— q =
R - 2rL + (1 - k)rD
2C
=0.
Solving the FOC yields rL = R+(1-k)rD.
We can now maximize CS with respect to the choice of capital, k. However, we know
from above that the combination of rL = ' and the highest possible k will be
optimal for borrowers. We therefore introduce the participation constraint for the bank,
that Π = q(rL — (1 — k)rD) — krE — cq2 ≥ 0. Substituting for q = rL~(2-k)rD as well as for
rL , we obtain
(R — (1 — k)rD)2
∏ = (-----( 16c ) D) — krE ≥ 0, k ≤ 1.
We can solve this for the value of k that satisfies the constraint with equality (Π =0). Since
Π is strictly convex in k, 0 ≤ k ≤ 1, and consumer surplus is increasing in k, the relevant
solution must be either the smaller root or a corner solution at k =1. The solution is then
kCS
. 8 8crE — RrD + rD — 4 JrEc (4crE — RrD + rD ) |
min ɪ----------------------rD----------------------■1 ʃ •
Note that if kCS = 1, then rL = RR.
We now check when in fact q< 1. From the definition of the optimal level of monitoring
q = min I rL (12- k)rD, 1}, we see that, for rL ≥ (1 — k)rD + 2c, q = 1. Substituting in the
optimal value for rL gives the following condition:
R +(1 — k)rD
2
≥ (1 — k)rD +2c.
The right hand side is maximized at k =0.Thus,asufficient condition for q =1is that
R — rD — 4c ≥ 0. In this case, there is no benefit in terms of greater monitoring to having
27
More intriguing information
1. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?2. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Moffett and rhetoric
6. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
7. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
8. Accurate and robust image superresolution by neural processing of local image representations
9. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
10. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey