for q< 1. Therefore, more capital increases consumer surplus.
We proceed in two stages, starting by maximizing CS with respect to the loan’s price,
rL ,forafixed k , which yields
∂CS
∂r L
dq ∖
∂rL (R — rL)— q =
R - 2rL + (1 - k)rD
2C
=0.
Solving the FOC yields rL = R+(1-k)rD.
We can now maximize CS with respect to the choice of capital, k. However, we know
from above that the combination of rL = ' and the highest possible k will be
optimal for borrowers. We therefore introduce the participation constraint for the bank,
that Π = q(rL — (1 — k)rD) — krE — cq2 ≥ 0. Substituting for q = rL~(2-k)rD as well as for
rL , we obtain
(R — (1 — k)rD)2
∏ = (-----( 16c ) D) — krE ≥ 0, k ≤ 1.
We can solve this for the value of k that satisfies the constraint with equality (Π =0). Since
Π is strictly convex in k, 0 ≤ k ≤ 1, and consumer surplus is increasing in k, the relevant
solution must be either the smaller root or a corner solution at k =1. The solution is then
kCS
. 8 8crE — RrD + rD — 4 JrEc (4crE — RrD + rD ) |
min ɪ----------------------rD----------------------■1 ʃ •
Note that if kCS = 1, then rL = RR.
We now check when in fact q< 1. From the definition of the optimal level of monitoring
q = min I rL (12- k)rD, 1}, we see that, for rL ≥ (1 — k)rD + 2c, q = 1. Substituting in the
optimal value for rL gives the following condition:
R +(1 — k)rD
2
≥ (1 — k)rD +2c.
The right hand side is maximized at k =0.Thus,asufficient condition for q =1is that
R — rD — 4c ≥ 0. In this case, there is no benefit in terms of greater monitoring to having
27
More intriguing information
1. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience2. The name is absent
3. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
7. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
8. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
9. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
10. The name is absent