Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis



The following proposition describes the post-merger equilibrium with symmetric behav-
ior within the ‘coalition’ (merger) and among competitors.

Proposition 3 The post-merger equilibrium with r1L = r2L = rmL and riL = rcL for i =3,...,N
is characterized as follows:

1.


2.


Each merged bank sets a loan rate rm = (21) + (NN-—cc + (+1)cm, and each

LonTtirNNf-1' Lf,∕s L~i — N —■1I — -I- (ʌ——с -I- --г* '

cumpeutui sets I c — I — -2 I γ +  — cc + cm ;

The merged banks have a total loan market share Lm (2—- 1 ¢ l+γ( 1(22) (cc-cm),
and each competitor has
Lc ———-)2) l γ(——(cc cm);

3. The merged banks raise total deposits Dm 1 1, Lm, and each competitor raises
1km

D = 1 L ∙

Dc    1-kc Lc ;

where cm, cc are the total marginal costs of the merged banks and of the competitors,
and
km and kc are their respective optimal reserve-deposit ratios.9

Since banks compete in strategic complements, the merged banks drive the loan rate
movements in the market and the competitors move in the same direction. The effect of a
merger on loan rates depends on the relative strength of a
market power effect and a cost
e
fficiency effect.Thefirst refers to the higher market power banks enjoy after a merger
because of the lower number of active banks (which reduces from N to N
1). The second
derives from the lower total marginal costs c
m that the merged banks enjoy relative to
competitors. Post-merger equilibrium loan rates increase when the merger induces small
cost advantages relative to the increase in market power, whereas they decrease otherwise.

Loan market shares across banks change in line with loan rates. As the merged banks
change their loan rates by more than competitors, their total loan market share shrinks
when loan rates increase and it expands otherwise, i.e., L
m < 2Lsq < 2Lc when rmL > rcL,
and L
m > 2Lsq > 2Lc otherwise.

The modification of loan market shares together with the change in the optimal reserve-
deposit ratio described in Proposition 2 determines the effects on the size of banks’ balance
sheets (as measured by the amount of deposits). In the present set-up the merger breaks

9 The expressions for cm, cc are in the proof of this proposition; those for km and kc are, respectively, in
the proof of Proposition 2 and in equation (10).

18



More intriguing information

1. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
2. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
3. The name is absent
4. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
5. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
6. The name is absent
7. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
8. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
9. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
10. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
11. The name is absent
12. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
13. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data
14. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
15. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
16. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
17. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
18. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
19. The name is absent
20. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China