det HτA H λ λHτ(A
m m m
+ n -21A ^1)^1 H
m J
(31)
times n2, converge jointly in distribution to the ordered solutions of the generalized
eigenvalue problem det[ W,m λ λVs;q r,m] = 0, where Ws,m ς ∑ Z1Y 2Y”Y” T,
(
V
s s,q-r,m
∑γ 2y.“y;
vk1
(32)
∖ 1(
(
m

Ib 1
Y
m

k= 1
m

Ik=1
** T
[cf. (23)], and the Yk** and X*k involved are independent s-variate and q-r-variate, respectively,
standard normal random vectors.
Note that the matrix Vs*, q-r,m in (32) differs from the matrix Vs*,m defined by (23) with r
replaced by s in that in the latter case the vectors X*k are (q-s) × 1 rather than (q-r) × 1.
If the null hypothesis (29) is false, then the matrix H can be written as
H R Rq rΓ1 + RrΓ2, where rank(Γ1) ^ s 1 ≥ 1, rank
(rʌ
γ1
2
V 2√
s.
(33)
Then again it follows straightforwardly from (15), (17) and (30) that
D m
H A. H →TτlRqlτrC(1)∑ XlXkτC(1)τRrrΓ,
k= 1
and
19
More intriguing information
1. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities2. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered
3. Markets for Influence
4. The name is absent
5. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
6. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
7. The name is absent
8. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
9. The problem of anglophone squint
10. Centre for Longitudinal Studies