Nonparametric cointegration analysis



JxFk(x)dx о 0,                                                                       (28)

respectively, and to verify afterwards that the optimal weight functions Fk satisfy the stronger
conditions (6) and (7).

Without loss of generality we may represent the functions Fk by their Fourier flexible
form

∞∞

Fk(x) α αo,k +αj,kcos(2jπx) +βj,ksin(2jπx)

Then by some tedious but straightforward calculations it can be shown that:

Lemma 6. The conditions (27), (28), (8), (9), and (10) now read as:

Fk(χ)dχ α αok - 0


;(χ)dχ - -F-β
2π J=1 J


ffFk(x )Fm (y )min(x, y ) dxdy


8π2



÷Σ

J=1


βJ,kβJ,


0 if km ,


F(x ) [Fm (y ) dydx = -r- Σ
4 4                  4 П 7=1


β

J, kt^J, m


Vj-1


Σ

j=1


β

J,m J,k


[Fk(x )Fm (x ) dx = ʌ


V α..α.

X-7   j, k j,

Ij'1


ʌ

-∞

÷    βjkβ rnt


0 if km .


Combining (1) and the results of Lemma 6, we have

16



More intriguing information

1. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
2. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
3. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
4. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
5. Public Debt Management in Brazil
6. A Classical Probabilistic Computer Model of Consciousness
7. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
8. New urban settlements in Belarus: some trends and changes
9. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
10. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals