Nonparametric cointegration analysis



JxFk(x)dx о 0,                                                                       (28)

respectively, and to verify afterwards that the optimal weight functions Fk satisfy the stronger
conditions (6) and (7).

Without loss of generality we may represent the functions Fk by their Fourier flexible
form

∞∞

Fk(x) α αo,k +αj,kcos(2jπx) +βj,ksin(2jπx)

Then by some tedious but straightforward calculations it can be shown that:

Lemma 6. The conditions (27), (28), (8), (9), and (10) now read as:

Fk(χ)dχ α αok - 0


;(χ)dχ - -F-β
2π J=1 J


ffFk(x )Fm (y )min(x, y ) dxdy


8π2



÷Σ

J=1


βJ,kβJ,


0 if km ,


F(x ) [Fm (y ) dydx = -r- Σ
4 4                  4 П 7=1


β

J, kt^J, m


Vj-1


Σ

j=1


β

J,m J,k


[Fk(x )Fm (x ) dx = ʌ


V α..α.

X-7   j, k j,

Ij'1


ʌ

-∞

÷    βjkβ rnt


0 if km .


Combining (1) and the results of Lemma 6, we have

16



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Midwest prospects and the new economy
3. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
4. Yield curve analysis
5. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
6. Workforce or Workfare?
7. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
8. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
9. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning
10. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?