Table 5: Acceptance frequencies (%)
(500 simulations, 10% significance level)
|
Nonpara- |
Johansen | |||
|
metric |
p = 6 |
p 8 8 |
p 1 10 | |
|
r о O |
9.6 |
21.2 |
14.6 |
32.2 |
|
r ι 1 |
79.2 |
58.0 |
70.4 |
56.2 |
|
r 2 2 |
11.2 |
20.8 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
|
Test of H t =<*) | ||||
|
(1,-0.40) |
20.960 |
10.345 |
5.398 |
4.626 |
|
(1,-0.50) |
40.152 |
17.241 |
11.648 |
8.897 |
|
(1,-0.60) |
63.384 |
40.000 |
25.568 |
21.352 |
|
(1,-0.65) |
75.758 |
67.586 |
51.705 |
37.722 |
|
(1,-0.70) |
85.859 |
80.690 |
68.466 |
55.872 |
|
(1,-0.75) |
90.404 |
42.414 |
43.182 |
39.858 |
|
(1,-0.80) |
90.909 |
15.517 |
15.625 |
18.149 |
|
(1,-0.90) |
82.071 |
1.379 |
1.705 |
4.626 |
|
(1,-1.00) |
66.414 |
0.690 |
1.420 |
3.203 |
(*) only for the cases with test result r = 1
36
More intriguing information
1. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption2. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
3. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
4. The name is absent
5. The problem of anglophone squint
6. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
7. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure