Nonparametric cointegration analysis



Separate Appendix to:
NONPARAMETRIC COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS
by Herman J.Bierens

Following Phillips (1987), we use throughout this appendix the symbol "" to indicate weak
convergence (cf. Billingsley 1968), convergence in distribution, or convergence in probability.
From the context it will be clear which mode of convergence applies.

Proof of Lemma 1: Denoting the partial sums associated with vt and wt by

[χn ]

Snv(χ) = 0 i [0,n ^1); Snv(χ) = vtif χ [n ^1,1L
t= 1

(A.1)


[xn ]

Snw(χ) = 0 i [0,n l) Snw(χ) = ∑ft ifχ [n^1,ι].

t=1

respectively, it follows easily that

( A

Snv


vf
Sn
V √


D (1)J


W,


(A.2)


where W is a q-variate standard Wiener process. Next, denote the partial sums associated with
zt and zt by

[χn ]

Sn(χ) = 0 if χ [0,n 1); Sn(χ) = ∑-χ if χ [n ^1,1],
t= 1
[χn]

(A.3)


s^δ(χ) = 0 if χ [0,n 1); Snz(χ) = ∑∆ztif χ [η ^1,1L
t=1

respectively. Then it follows from (3) and (A.2) that

37



More intriguing information

1. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
2. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”
3. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
9. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY