Nonparametric cointegration analysis



Separate Appendix to:
NONPARAMETRIC COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS
by Herman J.Bierens

Following Phillips (1987), we use throughout this appendix the symbol "" to indicate weak
convergence (cf. Billingsley 1968), convergence in distribution, or convergence in probability.
From the context it will be clear which mode of convergence applies.

Proof of Lemma 1: Denoting the partial sums associated with vt and wt by

[χn ]

Snv(χ) = 0 i [0,n ^1); Snv(χ) = vtif χ [n ^1,1L
t= 1

(A.1)


[xn ]

Snw(χ) = 0 i [0,n l) Snw(χ) = ∑ft ifχ [n^1,ι].

t=1

respectively, it follows easily that

( A

Snv


vf
Sn
V √


D (1)J


W,


(A.2)


where W is a q-variate standard Wiener process. Next, denote the partial sums associated with
zt and zt by

[χn ]

Sn(χ) = 0 if χ [0,n 1); Sn(χ) = ∑-χ if χ [n ^1,1],
t= 1
[χn]

(A.3)


s^δ(χ) = 0 if χ [0,n 1); Snz(χ) = ∑∆ztif χ [η ^1,1L
t=1

respectively. Then it follows from (3) and (A.2) that

37



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
3. Should informal sector be subsidised?
4. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
5. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
6. The name is absent
7. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
8. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
9. Picture recognition in animals and humans
10. The name is absent