nξ ξ TMnz ( F) ξ ξ IF(1)
I
snw(1)
nn
(A.13)
.. „ /-f c
ξ T(z0 - w 0)Vn F(1) - Jfx)
Note that
F(1) -jxf(x ) dx = ʃF(x ) dx = 0,
hence
F(1) - ʃInxlf(x)dx∖ ≤ 1 fxfx)|dx
J n n J
[nx ] dx 1
n
(A.14)
(A.15)
and consequently equation (A.13) then becomes
nξ ξ TMnz ( F) - ξ ïF(1)
I
Snw(1)
nn
- ʃfx) S^ dx 1
nn ^
(A.16)
Moreover,
ξTS∆(x) - ξ⅛∙m - ξTw0. (A'17)
and consequently
n ξτmδ(F) = ξ7(F(1)(wn~w0) - ʃʃ(x)(w[nx] ~w0)dx]
(A.18)
ξ ξ ^F(1)Wn - f/(.x )W [ nx ] dx) = F(1) ξ Twn + θp (1)-
The last equality in (A.18) follows from the fact that by the dominated convergence theorem,
40
More intriguing information
1. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control2. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity
3. The name is absent
4. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
5. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
6. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
7. The name is absent
8. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
9. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
10. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment