|
Table A.3 : Unit : |
root and |
trend stationarity tests for |
the extended |
Nelson- |
Plosser data | |||||||||
|
Test : |
Phillips |
Bierens-Guo Cauchy |
tests |
(abs. values) |
Bierens' |
higher-order sample | ||||||||
|
- |
Perron |
autocorrelation t |
ests (* |
=detr.) | ||||||||||
|
Variable |
n |
PPl |
PP2 |
BGl |
BG2 |
BG3 |
BG4 |
BG5 |
BG6 |
B(1,1) |
B(2,2) B |
* (1, D |
B*(2,2) |
concl. |
|
LN[CPI] |
129 |
2.29 |
-0.79 |
51.24 |
71.10 |
54.85 |
25.64 |
16.69 |
20.67 |
-16641 |
-6.15 |
-1.68 |
-8.49 |
UR? |
|
LN[GNPDEFL] |
100 |
1.43 |
-5.12 |
62.54 |
89.62 |
125.46 |
51.56 |
36.05 |
7.46 |
-10000 |
-3.85 |
-3.24 |
-9.71 |
UR? |
|
LN[EMPLOY] |
99 |
-0.27 |
-10.87 |
56.07 |
98.98 |
73.78 |
71.74 |
0.47 |
0.47 |
-0.86 |
-4.73 |
-43.20 |
-45.25 |
TST |
|
LN[UNEMPLOY] |
99 |
-21.35 |
-21.49 |
1.58 |
1.58 |
1.66 |
1.68 |
0.68 |
3.50 |
-2057 |
-2121 |
-2067 |
-2136 |
TST |
|
LN[GNP] |
80 |
0.56 |
-5.22 |
42.90 |
79.67 |
116.43 |
69.42 |
11.60 |
181.97 |
-0.04 |
-4.40 |
-2.87 |
-4.48 |
UR |
|
LN[GNPPCAP] |
80 |
0.16 |
-9.66 |
39.78 |
80.00 |
24.51 |
27.90 |
2.72 |
1.26 |
-0.91 |
-4.21 |
-90.71 |
-93.55 |
TST |
|
LN[RealGNP] |
80 |
0.17 |
-9.12 |
40.97 |
80.00 |
70.56 |
79.91 |
3.87 |
1.33 |
-0.27 |
-3.21 - |
133.33 |
-137.51 |
TST |
|
LN[WAGE] |
89 |
0.47 |
-6.96 |
46.26 |
88.80 |
148.13 |
76.72 |
10.08 |
5.60 |
-0.01 |
-3.22 |
-5.89 |
-8.93 |
UR |
|
LN[RealWAGE] |
89 |
-0.73 |
-4.95 |
35.04 |
88.29 |
60.68 |
49.80 |
9.55 |
1.64 |
-0.63 |
-1.82 |
-10.79 |
-26.87 |
? |
|
LN[INDPROD] |
129 |
-0.48 |
-16.99 |
81.62 |
128.75 |
128.77 |
151.27 |
7.07 |
1.70 |
-0.67 |
-3.48 |
-16641 |
-16641 |
TST |
|
LN[MONEY] |
100 |
0.22 |
-9.21 |
60.68 |
99.99 |
421.71 |
158.28 |
6.00 |
2.14 |
-0.08 |
-3.58 |
-10.31 |
-14.18 |
? |
|
INTEREST |
89 |
-1.52 |
-4.39 |
112.42 |
86.44 |
5.12 |
5.03 |
24.49 |
4.64 |
-7921 |
-16.32 |
-1.80 |
-27.37 |
? |
|
LN[STOCKPR] |
118 |
1.42 |
-6.50 |
84.65 |
115.95 |
27.10 |
29.56 |
17.55 |
7.67 |
-13924 |
-5.51 |
-2.92 |
-5.66 |
UR? |
|
LN[VELOCITY] |
120 |
-4.19 |
-2.82 |
9.23 |
10.25 |
8.19 |
14.18 |
21.56 |
46.71 |
-3.20 |
-3.26 |
-2.08 |
-5.47 |
UR |
|
LN[RealM] |
100 |
-1.09 |
-7.66 |
54.73 |
97.32 |
188.25 |
195.08 |
8.44 |
5.17 |
-0.97 |
-3.81 |
-14.87 |
-19.14 |
TST? |
|
RealINTEREST |
89 |
-29.23 |
-29.30 |
4.03 |
4.03 |
4.05 |
4.05 |
0.39 |
0.81 |
-7921 |
-7921 |
-7921 |
-7921 |
ST |
|
INFLATION |
128 |
-46.30 |
-40.10 |
1.53 |
1.53 |
1.60 |
1.63 |
0.42 |
1.44 |
-13.63 |
-15.90 |
-17.91 |
-19.53 |
ST |
|
5% R.R. |
<-14.0 |
<-21.5 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
<-14.0 |
<-15.7 |
<-20.6 |
<-22.4 | ||
|
10% R.R. |
<-ll .2 |
<-18.1 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
<-ll .2 |
<-13.1 |
<-17.1 |
<-18.9 | ||
|
H0: |
UR |
UR |
ST |
ST |
ST |
ST |
TST |
TST |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR | ||
|
H1: |
ST |
TST |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR |
ST |
ST |
TST |
TST | ||
|
Remarks : The |
first two test are |
the Phillips- |
Perron t |
ests Za |
of the |
null hypothesis |
H0: y(t) |
= y(t- |
■1) + u (t) , E [u (t) ] | |||||
|
0, u(t) is alpha |
-mixing, |
against |
the alternatives y(t |
) = c + |
u(t) and y(t) |
= c + b. |
t + u(t) |
, respectively. |
. The next s | |||||
|
tests are the |
Bierens-Guc |
'zs (1993) tests of the null |
hypothe |
sis H0: |
y(t) = |
c (+ d.t |
) + u(t), |
, E[u(t)]=0, u( |
t) is alpha- | |||||
mixing, against the unit root (with drift) hypothesis. The Phillips-Perron tests and Bierens-GuozS test no. 4 employ a
Newey and West (1987) type variance estimator with truncation parameter m = [5n0,2] . The last four tests are Bierens
(1993) unit root tests on the basis of higher order sample autocorrelations. The first two test the unit root hypothesis
against stationarity, and the last two have as alternative linear trend stationarity. These four tests depend on
parameters μ > O, a > O, and O < δ < 1, and the lag length is: m = 1+[αnδμz∙3μ+21 ] . The default values μ = 2, a = 5 and δ
= .5 are employed.
60
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
6. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
7. The name is absent
8. EFFICIENCY LOSS AND TRADABLE PERMITS
9. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
10. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin