Table A.3 : Unit : |
root and |
trend stationarity tests for |
the extended |
Nelson- |
Plosser data | |||||||||
Test : |
Phillips |
Bierens-Guo Cauchy |
tests |
(abs. values) |
Bierens' |
higher-order sample | ||||||||
- |
Perron |
autocorrelation t |
ests (* |
=detr.) | ||||||||||
Variable |
n |
PPl |
PP2 |
BGl |
BG2 |
BG3 |
BG4 |
BG5 |
BG6 |
B(1,1) |
B(2,2) B |
* (1, D |
B*(2,2) |
concl. |
LN[CPI] |
129 |
2.29 |
-0.79 |
51.24 |
71.10 |
54.85 |
25.64 |
16.69 |
20.67 |
-16641 |
-6.15 |
-1.68 |
-8.49 |
UR? |
LN[GNPDEFL] |
100 |
1.43 |
-5.12 |
62.54 |
89.62 |
125.46 |
51.56 |
36.05 |
7.46 |
-10000 |
-3.85 |
-3.24 |
-9.71 |
UR? |
LN[EMPLOY] |
99 |
-0.27 |
-10.87 |
56.07 |
98.98 |
73.78 |
71.74 |
0.47 |
0.47 |
-0.86 |
-4.73 |
-43.20 |
-45.25 |
TST |
LN[UNEMPLOY] |
99 |
-21.35 |
-21.49 |
1.58 |
1.58 |
1.66 |
1.68 |
0.68 |
3.50 |
-2057 |
-2121 |
-2067 |
-2136 |
TST |
LN[GNP] |
80 |
0.56 |
-5.22 |
42.90 |
79.67 |
116.43 |
69.42 |
11.60 |
181.97 |
-0.04 |
-4.40 |
-2.87 |
-4.48 |
UR |
LN[GNPPCAP] |
80 |
0.16 |
-9.66 |
39.78 |
80.00 |
24.51 |
27.90 |
2.72 |
1.26 |
-0.91 |
-4.21 |
-90.71 |
-93.55 |
TST |
LN[RealGNP] |
80 |
0.17 |
-9.12 |
40.97 |
80.00 |
70.56 |
79.91 |
3.87 |
1.33 |
-0.27 |
-3.21 - |
133.33 |
-137.51 |
TST |
LN[WAGE] |
89 |
0.47 |
-6.96 |
46.26 |
88.80 |
148.13 |
76.72 |
10.08 |
5.60 |
-0.01 |
-3.22 |
-5.89 |
-8.93 |
UR |
LN[RealWAGE] |
89 |
-0.73 |
-4.95 |
35.04 |
88.29 |
60.68 |
49.80 |
9.55 |
1.64 |
-0.63 |
-1.82 |
-10.79 |
-26.87 |
? |
LN[INDPROD] |
129 |
-0.48 |
-16.99 |
81.62 |
128.75 |
128.77 |
151.27 |
7.07 |
1.70 |
-0.67 |
-3.48 |
-16641 |
-16641 |
TST |
LN[MONEY] |
100 |
0.22 |
-9.21 |
60.68 |
99.99 |
421.71 |
158.28 |
6.00 |
2.14 |
-0.08 |
-3.58 |
-10.31 |
-14.18 |
? |
INTEREST |
89 |
-1.52 |
-4.39 |
112.42 |
86.44 |
5.12 |
5.03 |
24.49 |
4.64 |
-7921 |
-16.32 |
-1.80 |
-27.37 |
? |
LN[STOCKPR] |
118 |
1.42 |
-6.50 |
84.65 |
115.95 |
27.10 |
29.56 |
17.55 |
7.67 |
-13924 |
-5.51 |
-2.92 |
-5.66 |
UR? |
LN[VELOCITY] |
120 |
-4.19 |
-2.82 |
9.23 |
10.25 |
8.19 |
14.18 |
21.56 |
46.71 |
-3.20 |
-3.26 |
-2.08 |
-5.47 |
UR |
LN[RealM] |
100 |
-1.09 |
-7.66 |
54.73 |
97.32 |
188.25 |
195.08 |
8.44 |
5.17 |
-0.97 |
-3.81 |
-14.87 |
-19.14 |
TST? |
RealINTEREST |
89 |
-29.23 |
-29.30 |
4.03 |
4.03 |
4.05 |
4.05 |
0.39 |
0.81 |
-7921 |
-7921 |
-7921 |
-7921 |
ST |
INFLATION |
128 |
-46.30 |
-40.10 |
1.53 |
1.53 |
1.60 |
1.63 |
0.42 |
1.44 |
-13.63 |
-15.90 |
-17.91 |
-19.53 |
ST |
5% R.R. |
<-14.0 |
<-21.5 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
>12.71 |
<-14.0 |
<-15.7 |
<-20.6 |
<-22.4 | ||
10% R.R. |
<-ll .2 |
<-18.1 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
>6.31 |
<-ll .2 |
<-13.1 |
<-17.1 |
<-18.9 | ||
H0: |
UR |
UR |
ST |
ST |
ST |
ST |
TST |
TST |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR | ||
H1: |
ST |
TST |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR |
UR |
ST |
ST |
TST |
TST | ||
Remarks : The |
first two test are |
the Phillips- |
Perron t |
ests Za |
of the |
null hypothesis |
H0: y(t) |
= y(t- |
■1) + u (t) , E [u (t) ] | |||||
0, u(t) is alpha |
-mixing, |
against |
the alternatives y(t |
) = c + |
u(t) and y(t) |
= c + b. |
t + u(t) |
, respectively. |
. The next s | |||||
tests are the |
Bierens-Guc |
'zs (1993) tests of the null |
hypothe |
sis H0: |
y(t) = |
c (+ d.t |
) + u(t), |
, E[u(t)]=0, u( |
t) is alpha- |
mixing, against the unit root (with drift) hypothesis. The Phillips-Perron tests and Bierens-GuozS test no. 4 employ a
Newey and West (1987) type variance estimator with truncation parameter m = [5n0,2] . The last four tests are Bierens
(1993) unit root tests on the basis of higher order sample autocorrelations. The first two test the unit root hypothesis
against stationarity, and the last two have as alternative linear trend stationarity. These four tests depend on
parameters μ > O, a > O, and O < δ < 1, and the lag length is: m = 1+[αnδμz∙3μ+21 ] . The default values μ = 2, a = 5 and δ
= .5 are employed.
60
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
6. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
7. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
8. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent