Table A.6: Johansen’s test results for the number (r) of cointegrating vectors (intercept
present, but linear trend absent)
|
p |
r |
test |
crit. |
val. |
conclusions: |
test table(*) type | |
|
10% |
5% | ||||||
|
_2_ |
__0__ |
___7._8__ |
__1__2.__1 |
_14__.0__ |
accept |
accept |
lambda-max A.1 |
|
1 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
8.7 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
7.8 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
accept |
accept |
lambda-max A.2 | |
|
1 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
8.7 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
16.4 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
|
1 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
22.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
8.63 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
reject |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
|
r=0 |
r=0 | ||||||
|
4 |
0 |
15.2 |
12.1 |
14.0 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.1 |
|
1 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
17.6 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
15.2 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.2 | |
|
1 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
17.6 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
reject |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
18.5 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
|
1 |
11.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
11.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
reject |
reject |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
30.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
3.36 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
accept |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
|
r=1 |
r=2 | ||||||
|
6 |
0 |
14.7 |
12.1 |
14.0 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.1 |
|
1 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
16.9 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
14.7 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.2 | |
|
1 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
16.9 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
reject |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
19.0 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
|
1 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
25.7 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
4.31 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
reject |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
|
r=1 |
r=1 | ||||||
(*) Cf. Johansen and Juselius (1990). Table A.3 applies if cointegration restrictions have been imposed on
the intercept parameters, whereas tables A.1 and A.2 apply if no cointegration restrictions are imposed. Table
A.2 applies if these cointegration restrictions actually hold, and table A.1 applies if not. The χ2(1) tests test the
null hypothesis that cointegration restrictions on the intercept parameters hold, given r = 1, i.e., that the
cointegration relation contains an intercept rather than the error correction model itself.
62
More intriguing information
1. Global Excess Liquidity and House Prices - A VAR Analysis for OECD Countries2. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
3. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
4. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
5. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
6. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
7. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
8. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
9. AN EXPLORATION OF THE NEED FOR AND COST OF SELECTED TRADE FACILITATION MEASURES IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WTO NEGOTIATIONS
10. The name is absent