Table A.6: Johansen’s test results for the number (r) of cointegrating vectors (intercept
present, but linear trend absent)
p |
r |
test |
crit. |
val. |
conclusions: |
test table(*) type | |
10% |
5% | ||||||
_2_ |
__0__ |
___7._8__ |
__1__2.__1 |
_14__.0__ |
accept |
accept |
lambda-max A.1 |
1 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
8.7 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
0 |
7.8 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
accept |
accept |
lambda-max A.2 | |
1 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
8.7 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
0 |
16.4 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
1 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
22.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
8.63 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
reject |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
r=0 |
r=0 | ||||||
4 |
0 |
15.2 |
12.1 |
14.0 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.1 |
1 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
17.6 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
0 |
15.2 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.2 | |
1 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
17.6 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
reject |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
0 |
18.5 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
1 |
11.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
11.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
reject |
reject |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
30.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
3.36 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
accept |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
r=1 |
r=2 | ||||||
6 |
0 |
14.7 |
12.1 |
14.0 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.1 |
1 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
16.9 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
0 |
14.7 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.2 | |
1 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
16.9 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
reject |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
0 |
19.0 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
1 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
0 |
25.7 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
1 |
4.31 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
reject |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
r=1 |
r=1 |
(*) Cf. Johansen and Juselius (1990). Table A.3 applies if cointegration restrictions have been imposed on
the intercept parameters, whereas tables A.1 and A.2 apply if no cointegration restrictions are imposed. Table
A.2 applies if these cointegration restrictions actually hold, and table A.1 applies if not. The χ2(1) tests test the
null hypothesis that cointegration restrictions on the intercept parameters hold, given r = 1, i.e., that the
cointegration relation contains an intercept rather than the error correction model itself.
62
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
5. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
6. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
7. The name is absent
8. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
9. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
10. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform