Table A.6: Johansen’s test results for the number (r) of cointegrating vectors (intercept
present, but linear trend absent)
|
p |
r |
test |
crit. |
val. |
conclusions: |
test table(*) type | |
|
10% |
5% | ||||||
|
_2_ |
__0__ |
___7._8__ |
__1__2.__1 |
_14__.0__ |
accept |
accept |
lambda-max A.1 |
|
1 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
8.7 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
7.8 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
accept |
accept |
lambda-max A.2 | |
|
1 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
8.7 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
16.4 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
|
1 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
22.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
8.63 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
reject |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
|
r=0 |
r=0 | ||||||
|
4 |
0 |
15.2 |
12.1 |
14.0 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.1 |
|
1 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
17.6 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
15.2 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.2 | |
|
1 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
17.6 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
reject |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
18.5 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
|
1 |
11.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
11.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
reject |
reject |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
30.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
3.36 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
accept |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
|
r=1 |
r=2 | ||||||
|
6 |
0 |
14.7 |
12.1 |
14.0 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.1 |
|
1 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
16.9 |
13.3 |
15.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
14.7 |
12.8 |
14.6 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.2 | |
|
1 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
16.9 |
15.6 |
17.8 |
reject |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
0 |
19.0 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
reject |
reject |
lambda-max A.3 | |
|
1 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
accept |
accept |
trace ’’ | |
|
0 |
25.7 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
reject |
reject |
’’ ’’ | |
|
1 |
4.31 |
2.71 |
3.84 |
reject |
reject |
interc. restr. χ2(1) | |
|
r=1 |
r=1 | ||||||
(*) Cf. Johansen and Juselius (1990). Table A.3 applies if cointegration restrictions have been imposed on
the intercept parameters, whereas tables A.1 and A.2 apply if no cointegration restrictions are imposed. Table
A.2 applies if these cointegration restrictions actually hold, and table A.1 applies if not. The χ2(1) tests test the
null hypothesis that cointegration restrictions on the intercept parameters hold, given r = 1, i.e., that the
cointegration relation contains an intercept rather than the error correction model itself.
62
More intriguing information
1. International Financial Integration*2. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
3. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European
4. The name is absent
5. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
6. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
7. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
8. The name is absent
9. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
10. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM