Nonparametric cointegration analysis



Table A.6: Johansen’s test results for the number (r) of cointegrating vectors (intercept
present, but linear trend absent
)


p

r

test
stat.

crit.
10%

val.
5%

conclusions:

test         table(*)

type

10%

5%

_2_

__0__

___7._8__

__1__2.__1

_14__.0__

accept

accept

lambda-max     A.1

1

0.9

2.8

4.0

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

0.9

2.8

4.0

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

8.7

13.3

15.2

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

0

7.8

12.8

14.6

accept

accept

lambda-max     A.2

1

0.9

6.7

8.1

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

0.9

6.7

8.1

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

8.7

15.6

17.8

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

0

16.4

13.8

15.8

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.3

1

6.1

7.6

9.1

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

6.1

7.6

9.1

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

22.5

18.0

20.2

reject

reject

’’                     ’’

1

8.63

2.71

3.84

reject

reject

interc. restr. χ2(1)

r=0

r=0

4

0

15.2

12.1

14.0

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.1

1

2.4

2.8

4.0

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

2.4

2.8

4.0

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

17.6

13.3

15.2

reject

reject

’’                     ’’

0

15.2

12.8

14.6

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.2

1

2.4

6.7

8.1

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

2.4

6.7

8.1

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

17.6

15.6

17.8

reject

accept

’’                     ’’

0

18.5

13.8

15.8

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.3

1

11.9

7.6

9.1

reject

reject

’’                     ’’

1

11.9

7.6

9.1

reject

reject

trace           ’’

0

30.5

18.0

20.2

reject

reject

’’                     ’’

1

3.36

2.71

3.84

reject

accept

interc. restr. χ2(1)

r=1

r=2

6

0

14.7

12.1

14.0

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.1

1

2.2

2.8

4.0

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

2.2

2.8

4.0

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

16.9

13.3

15.2

reject

reject

’’                     ’’

0

14.7

12.8

14.6

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.2

1

2.2

6.7

8.1

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

2.2

6.7

8.1

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

16.9

15.6

17.8

reject

accept

’’                     ’’

0

19.0

13.8

15.8

reject

reject

lambda-max     A.3

1

6.7

7.6

9.1

accept

accept

’’                     ’’

1

6.7

7.6

9.1

accept

accept

trace           ’’

0

25.7

18.0

20.2

reject

reject

’’                     ’’

1

4.31

2.71

3.84

reject

reject

interc. restr. χ2(1)

r=1

r=1


(*) Cf. Johansen and Juselius (1990). Table A.3 applies if cointegration restrictions have been imposed on
the intercept parameters, whereas tables A.1 and A.2 apply if no cointegration restrictions are imposed. Table
A.2 applies if these cointegration restrictions actually hold, and table A.1 applies if not. The
χ2(1) tests test the
null hypothesis that cointegration restrictions on the intercept parameters hold, given
r = 1, i.e., that the
cointegration relation contains an intercept rather than the error correction model itself.


62




More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
5. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
6. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
7. The name is absent
8. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
9. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
10. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform