feature of the income-contingent loan system, given its design, but this to our
knowledge represents the first empirical estimation of such distributional effects.
Table . Average graduate payments under new HE system (debt of £18,340), by
decile of graduate lifetime earnings distribution
Decile of |
a |
b |
c | ||||||
All |
Females |
Males |
All |
Females |
Males |
All |
Females |
Males | |
Poorest |
£9,077 |
£13,43 |
50.5% |
22.7 |
23.8 |
18.6 | |||
£ 7,435 |
0 |
59.5% |
26.8% | ||||||
2∏d |
£13,314 |
£14,64 |
27.4% |
19.4 |
21.6 |
15.7 | |||
£10,900 |
0 |
40.6% |
20.2% | ||||||
3rd |
£14,419 |
£14,92 |
21.4% |
17.2 |
19.9 |
14.4 | |||
£13,180 |
5 |
28.1% |
18.6% | ||||||
4th |
£14,792 |
£15,16 |
19.3% |
15.4 |
17.9 |
13.3 | |||
£14,225 |
0 |
22.4% |
17.4% | ||||||
5th |
£14,963 |
£15,33 |
18.4% |
14.4 |
16.4 |
12.5 | |||
£14,645 |
0 |
20.1% |
16.4% | ||||||
6tth |
£15,164 |
£15,49 |
17.3% |
13.4 |
15.3 |
11.7 | |||
£14,850 |
0 |
19.0% |
15.5% | ||||||
7lh |
£15,333 |
£15,63 |
16.4% |
12.6 |
14.5 |
11.1 | |||
£14,980 |
0 |
18.3% |
14.8% | ||||||
8tth |
£15,527 |
£15,79 |
15.3% |
11.7 |
13.4 |
10.4 | |||
£15,185 |
0 |
17.2% |
13.9% | ||||||
9th |
£15,757 |
£15,88 |
14.1% |
10.6 |
12.6 |
9.9 | |||
£15,340 |
0 |
16.4% |
13.4% | ||||||
Richest |
£16,004 |
£16,10 |
2.7% |
9.4 |
11.1 |
9.0 | |||
£15,670 |
5 |
14.6% |
12.2% | ||||||
All |
£14,439 |
£13,640 |
£15,23 |
21.3% |
16.9 |
16.6 |
12.7 | ||
8 |
25.6% |
% |
14.7 |
Figure a. Net present value of graduate repayments under the new HE system
15
More intriguing information
1. Nonparametric cointegration analysis2. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
3. The name is absent
4. Unemployment in an Interdependent World
5. The name is absent
6. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
7. The name is absent
8. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
9. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
10. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics