Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs



of loans remains income-contingent, with debt write-off after 25 years, but the
interest rate subsidy is effectively eliminated by the charging of interest of 2.5%
pa above inflation on the debt.

Variant 2: “NZ” system: under this variant, similar to the one currently in
place in New Zealand, the repayment of loans also remains income-contingent,
with debt write-off after 25 years, and the interest rate subsidy is eliminated by the
charging of interest of 2.5% pa above inflation on the debt. However when
earnings are low, the income-contingent repayment amount may be too low to
cover the interest element of the loan. In this case, the government would pay on
behalf of the borrower the additional interest due, meaning that the outstanding
balance on the loan would be prevented from spiralling during periods of low
earnings.

Our calculations suggest that the removal of the interest subsidy (i.e. a switch from
the new system to variant 1) would amount to the equivalent of the removal of an
average up-front grant of around £2,465 for each female graduate and £2,880 for each
male graduate (whilst the additional cost to the graduate of the “NZ system” relative
to the new system would be around £1,940 and £2,280 respectively).

However, as can be seen from Table , these savings for the exchequer, and costs to the
graduate would be highest for men in the 2nd to 4th deciles of the male lifetime
earnings distribution, and for women at the 6th and 7th, deciles of the female earnings
distribution. The very lowest female earners would lose relatively little from the
removal of the interest subsidy, since many are protected by the provision for debt
write-off after 25 years.

Table . Average additional costs to graduates of removing interest subsidies,

relative to new system, by decile of the lifetime earnings distribution________

Decile of
lifetime
earnings
distributio
n_________

Variant 1,
2.5% real interest
£

Variant 2,
“NZ system”
£

Poorest

2nd

3rd

Additional cost to graduate
compared to new system

F           M

£371         £2,924

£1,016        £3,491

£1,827        £3,390

Additional cost to graduate
compared to new system
F            M

£299          £2,118

£819          £2,578

£1,450          £2,539

24



More intriguing information

1. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
2. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
3. The name is absent
4. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
5. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
6. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA
7. The name is absent
8. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
9. The name is absent
10. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]