Table 1: A summary of the Dutch labour market 1970-1996
|
1970 |
1984 |
1996 |
Annual % change |
Annual % change | |
|
Participation rate (%) | |||||
|
Total |
57,3 |
54,6 |
63,5 |
-0,2 |
0,7 |
|
All 15-24 year |
58,9 |
42,0 |
45,0 |
-1,3 |
0,3 |
|
Women 25-49 year |
23,5 |
38,2 |
61,9 |
1,1 |
2,0 |
|
Men 25-49 year |
96,9 |
92,2 |
93,2 |
-0,4 |
0,1 |
|
All 50-64 year |
49,6 |
37,5 |
41,6 |
-0,9 |
0,3 |
|
Employment (>1 hours) | |||||
|
Jobs |
5.469.000 |
5.718.000 |
6.982.000 |
0,3 |
1,8 |
|
Labour years |
4.763.000 |
4.672.000 |
5.503.000 |
-0,1 |
1,5 |
|
Labour hours (x1.000) |
9.559.000 |
8.386.000 |
9.581.000 |
-0,9 |
1,2 |
|
Employment (>12 hours) | |||||
|
Industry and agriculture |
2.183.000 |
1.560.000 |
1.571.000 |
-2,4 |
0,1 |
|
Private services |
1.704.000 |
1.810.000 |
2.493.000 |
0,4 |
3,0 |
|
Public and subsidised services |
919.000 |
1.273.000 |
1.369.000 |
2,4 |
0,7 |
|
Full-time jobs |
3.742.000 |
3.497.000 |
3.648.000 |
-0,5 |
0,4 |
|
Part-time jobs (>12 hours) |
635.000 |
1.079.000 |
1.844.000 |
3,9 |
4,6 |
|
Atypical jobs |
219.000 |
354.000 |
723.000 |
3,5 |
6,1 |
|
Low-paid jobs (<2/3 median) |
460.000 |
347.000 / 415,000 |
524,000 |
-3,9 |
2,4 |
|
Real wage rate (1970=100) |
100 |
137 |
147 |
2,3 |
0,6 |
|
Wage distribution (inter-quartile) |
0,454 |
0,399 / 0,418 |
0,462 |
-1,8 |
1,0 |
|
Hours per year (full-time job) |
2.007 |
1795 |
1.741 |
-0,8 |
-0,3 |
|
Unemployment |
44.000 |
591.000 |
440.000 |
20,4 |
-2,4 |
|
Share long-time unemployed |
9% |
53% |
49% |
3,1 |
-0,3 |
|
Vacancies (x 1000)_______________ |
________________52.000 |
_____________31.000 |
_________69.000 |
_________________________-4.6 |
_______________________6.9 |
source: own calculations from CBS 1998, SCP 1998.
oɔ
More intriguing information
1. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area2. The name is absent
3. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
4. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
5. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
6. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent