Table 10. Employment Effect of the US Consumption Vector
(% of country employment)
|
STEP 1 |
STEP 2 |
STEP 3 |
TOTAL |
|
Service |
Service |
Manufacturing |
Consumption |
|
Mix |
Share |
Mix |
Mix |
% of employment from consumption activities
Country
|
UK |
3.44 |
2.56 |
0.01 |
6.01 |
|
GERMANY |
5.80 |
1.28 |
-0.75 |
6.33 |
|
FRANCE |
6.37 |
4.17 |
-0.62 |
9.92 |
|
NL |
10.66 |
-0.03 |
-0.25 |
10.39 |
|
SPAIN |
-4.08 |
-0.43 |
-2.65 |
-7.16 |
% of total employment
Country
|
UK |
1.67 |
1.24 |
0.00 |
2.91 |
|
GERMANY |
2.58 |
0.57 |
-0.34 |
2.82 |
|
FRANCE |
2.92 |
1.91 |
-0.29 |
4.54 |
|
NL |
3.09 |
-0.01 |
-0.07 |
3.01 |
|
SPAIN |
-2.14 |
-0.23 |
-1.39 |
-3.75 |
STEP 1: country total, country manufacturing mix, country service share in consumption, US service mix
STEP 2: country total, country manufacturing mix, US service share in consumption, US service mix
STEP 2: country total, US manufacturing mix, US service share in consumption, US service mix
85
More intriguing information
1. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception2. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
3. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
4. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
5. Moffett and rhetoric
6. Fertility in Developing Countries
7. Workforce or Workfare?
8. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent