Table A1. The Allocation of Employment by Vertically Integrated Sectors:
A Numerical Example
|
X2 30 25 20 |
X3 15 30 25 |
Intermediate 115 85 95 |
Final 110 126 55 |
Gross |
Employment 10 20 80 | ||
|
X1 | |||||||
|
X1 70 | |||||||
|
X2 30 | |||||||
|
X3 50 | |||||||
|
Total intermediate use 150 Value added 75 Gross output 225 (I-A) -0.13 -0.22 Employment coefficient (n) 0.044 0 0 |
75 136 211 -0.14 0.88 -0.09 |
70 80 150 -0.10 -0.20 0.83 B*FD 174.92 |
35.83 |
291 291 B = (I - A)"1 1.59 0.28 0.35 1.23 0.46 0.22 14.25 |
0.26 0.34 1.31 Final Demand (FD) 110 0 0 | ||
|
0 |
0.095 0 |
38.02 |
154.51 |
18.47 |
0 126 0 | ||
|
0 |
0 0.533 |
50.97 |
27.13 |
71.90 |
0 0 55 | ||
|
n Employment (column sum) |
*B*FD 7.77 3.60 27.18 38.56 |
1.59 14.65 14.47 30.71 |
0.63 1.75 38.35 40.73 |
Employment (row sum) 10 20 80 110 | |||
86
More intriguing information
1. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector2. The name is absent
3. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
4. The name is absent
5. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
6. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
7. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity
8. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
9. The Values and Character Dispositions of 14-16 Year Olds in the Hodge Hill Constituency
10. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870