Table A1. The Allocation of Employment by Vertically Integrated Sectors:
A Numerical Example
|
X2 30 25 20 |
X3 15 30 25 |
Intermediate 115 85 95 |
Final 110 126 55 |
Gross |
Employment 10 20 80 | ||
|
X1 | |||||||
|
X1 70 | |||||||
|
X2 30 | |||||||
|
X3 50 | |||||||
|
Total intermediate use 150 Value added 75 Gross output 225 (I-A) -0.13 -0.22 Employment coefficient (n) 0.044 0 0 |
75 136 211 -0.14 0.88 -0.09 |
70 80 150 -0.10 -0.20 0.83 B*FD 174.92 |
35.83 |
291 291 B = (I - A)"1 1.59 0.28 0.35 1.23 0.46 0.22 14.25 |
0.26 0.34 1.31 Final Demand (FD) 110 0 0 | ||
|
0 |
0.095 0 |
38.02 |
154.51 |
18.47 |
0 126 0 | ||
|
0 |
0 0.533 |
50.97 |
27.13 |
71.90 |
0 0 55 | ||
|
n Employment (column sum) |
*B*FD 7.77 3.60 27.18 38.56 |
1.59 14.65 14.47 30.71 |
0.63 1.75 38.35 40.73 |
Employment (row sum) 10 20 80 110 | |||
86
More intriguing information
1. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET2. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
3. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
4. Großhandel: Steigende Umsätze und schwungvolle Investitionsdynamik
5. The name is absent
6. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
7. Citizenship
8. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
9. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
10. Unemployment in an Interdependent World