The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production



Table A1. The Allocation of Employment by Vertically Integrated Sectors:
A Numerical Example

X2

30

25

20

X3

15

30

25

Intermediate
sales

115

85

95

Final
demand

110

126

55

Gross
output
225
211
150

Employment

10

20

80

X1

X1    70

X2    30

X3    50

Total intermediate use    150

Value added    75

Gross output   225

(I-A)
0.69

-0.13

-0.22

Employment coefficient (n)

0.044              0      0

75

136

211

-0.14

0.88

-0.09

70

80

150

-0.10

-0.20

0.83

B*FD

174.92

35.83

291

291

B = (I - A)"1

1.59      0.28

0.35       1.23

0.46      0.22

14.25

0.26

0.34

1.31

Final Demand (FD)

110         0       0

0

0.095      0

38.02

154.51

18.47

0       126       0

0

0 0.533

50.97

27.13

71.90

0         0      55

n

Employment

(column sum)

*B*FD

7.77

3.60

27.18

38.56

1.59

14.65

14.47

30.71

0.63

1.75

38.35

40.73

Employment

(row sum)

10

20

80

110

86



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
3. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
4. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
5. The name is absent
6. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
7. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
8. The name is absent
9. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
10. The name is absent