Table A1. The Allocation of Employment by Vertically Integrated Sectors:
A Numerical Example
X2 30 25 20 |
X3 15 30 25 |
Intermediate 115 85 95 |
Final 110 126 55 |
Gross |
Employment 10 20 80 | ||
X1 | |||||||
X1 70 | |||||||
X2 30 | |||||||
X3 50 | |||||||
Total intermediate use 150 Value added 75 Gross output 225 (I-A) -0.13 -0.22 Employment coefficient (n) 0.044 0 0 |
75 136 211 -0.14 0.88 -0.09 |
70 80 150 -0.10 -0.20 0.83 B*FD 174.92 |
35.83 |
291 291 B = (I - A)"1 1.59 0.28 0.35 1.23 0.46 0.22 14.25 |
0.26 0.34 1.31 Final Demand (FD) 110 0 0 | ||
0 |
0.095 0 |
38.02 |
154.51 |
18.47 |
0 126 0 | ||
0 |
0 0.533 |
50.97 |
27.13 |
71.90 |
0 0 55 | ||
n Employment (column sum) |
*B*FD 7.77 3.60 27.18 38.56 |
1.59 14.65 14.47 30.71 |
0.63 1.75 38.35 40.73 |
Employment (row sum) 10 20 80 110 |
86
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
3. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
4. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
5. The name is absent
6. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
7. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
8. The name is absent
9. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
10. The name is absent