Table 3. Allowable Parameter Values for the Slaughter Plant Optimisation Problem*
|
_____________Parameters_________ |
______min |
max |
step size |
|
αo - Producer quality premium |
0.50 |
4.25 |
0.05 |
|
αι - Production history indicator level |
1 |
24 |
1 |
|
α2 - Maximum testing probability |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.01 |
|
α3 - Testing probability reduction |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.01 |
|
α4 - Minimum testing probability |
0.00 |
0.50 |
0.10 |
|
α5 - Producer share of testing cost |
0.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
α6 - Producer penalty |
0.00 |
4.25 |
0.10 |
|
α7 - Serological threshold value |
0 |
30 |
10 |
|
g(γ) - Plant level Salmonella control |
1 |
3 |
1 |
* All pig herds are tested with a value of 1.00 for α2 and α4 and a value of 0.00 for α3 when plant
control package γ3 is used.
27
More intriguing information
1. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE2. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
3. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
4. PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
5. The name is absent
6. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
7. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
8. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
9. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
10. The name is absent