Table 3. Allowable Parameter Values for the Slaughter Plant Optimisation Problem*
|
_____________Parameters_________ |
______min |
max |
step size |
|
αo - Producer quality premium |
0.50 |
4.25 |
0.05 |
|
αι - Production history indicator level |
1 |
24 |
1 |
|
α2 - Maximum testing probability |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.01 |
|
α3 - Testing probability reduction |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.01 |
|
α4 - Minimum testing probability |
0.00 |
0.50 |
0.10 |
|
α5 - Producer share of testing cost |
0.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
α6 - Producer penalty |
0.00 |
4.25 |
0.10 |
|
α7 - Serological threshold value |
0 |
30 |
10 |
|
g(γ) - Plant level Salmonella control |
1 |
3 |
1 |
* All pig herds are tested with a value of 1.00 for α2 and α4 and a value of 0.00 for α3 when plant
control package γ3 is used.
27
More intriguing information
1. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting2. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
3. Importing Feminist Criticism
4. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
8. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
9. The name is absent
10. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa