Table 2. Descriptive statistics of labor allocation for participants and nonparticipants.
|
Participants (as of 2005) |
Nonparticipants | |||
|
1999 |
2004 |
1999 |
2004 | |
|
Percent of individuals with |
23.9 |
32.4 |
28.2 |
30.8 |
|
Percent of individuals with |
69.1 |
67.4 |
69.4 |
76.7 |
|
Household members with |
0.72 |
1.24 |
0.93 |
1.15 |
|
Household members working on-farm (persons) |
2.59 |
2.59 |
2.53 |
2.90 |
|
If the individual has |
2002 |
2004 |
2002 |
2004 |
|
hours per day |
9.2 |
9.6* |
9.4 |
9.0* |
|
days per year |
171 |
188 |
196 |
164 |
|
months per year |
6.7* |
7.0 |
7.6* |
6.3 |
|
annual earnings (yuan) |
3,313* |
4,305 |
4,339* |
5,736 |
|
annual remittances (yuan) |
1,936* |
2,362 |
2,812* |
3,180 |
39
Note: * indicates that the average for participants and nonparticipants for the given year are
statistically significantly different.
More intriguing information
1. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS2. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
6. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
7. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
8. The name is absent
9. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
10. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?