57
Appendix Tables
Appendix Table 1. Impact of Grain for Green on household and individual members’
off-farm labor participation for participating households that changed status from
nonparticipating to participating between 2002 and 2004.
Off-farm Farm
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) | |
|
Household |
Individual |
Household |
Individual | |
|
treatment x year2004 |
0.534 |
0.318 |
-0.280 |
-0.039 |
|
(2.05)** |
(2.91)*** |
(1.05) |
(0.32) | |
|
treatment |
-0.142 |
-0.045 |
-0.045 |
-0.011 |
|
(0.76) |
(1.30) |
(0.24) |
(0.35) | |
|
year 2004 dummy |
0.065 |
0.023 |
0.497 |
0.123 |
|
(0.33) |
(0.29) |
(2.51)** |
(1.31) | |
|
year 2004 * Yangtze basin |
0.422 |
0.171 |
-0.300 |
-0.120 |
|
(2.27)** |
(2.17)** |
(1.58) |
(1.05) | |
|
household size |
0.129 |
0.018 |
0.168 |
0.021 |
|
(2.47)** |
(1.00) |
(3.03)*** |
(0.99) | |
|
total land holdings |
-0.003 |
0.001 |
0.007 |
0.006 |
|
(0.34) |
(0.29) |
(0.92) |
(2.72)*** | |
|
household members with |
0.503 |
0.759 | ||
|
off-farm work in 1999 |
(5.70)*** |
(12.55)*** | ||
|
household members with farm |
0.736 |
0.735 | ||
|
work in 1999 |
(10.97)*** |
(14.25)*** | ||
|
Constant |
-0.124 |
-0.176 | ||
|
(0.44) |
(0.59) | |||
|
Observations |
132 |
459 |
132 |
459 |
|
R-square |
0.36 |
0.60 |
Absolute value of t-statistics in parentheses
* significant at 10 percent level; ** at 5 percent level; *** at 1 percent level
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
6. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
7. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
8. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
9. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
10. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules