Household Individual
|
(1) off-farm |
(2) farm |
(3) off-farm |
(4) farm | |
|
poorest in asset value in 1999 |
0.681 |
-0.155 |
0.358 |
-0.117 |
|
(dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(2.18)** |
(0.48) |
(2.54)** |
(0.99) |
|
second poorest in asset value in |
1.244 |
-0.273 |
0.479 |
0.040 |
|
1999 (dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(3.22)*** |
(0.68) |
(2.92)*** |
(0.29) |
|
second richest in asset value in |
-0.020 |
0.041 |
0.275 | |
|
1999 (dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(0.06) |
(0.11) |
(1.69)* | |
|
richest in asset value in 1999 |
0.096 |
-0.425 |
0.065 |
-0.191 |
|
(dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(0.27) |
(1.17) |
(0.43) |
(1.35) |
|
treatment |
-0.126 |
-0.055 |
-0.041 |
0.022 |
|
(0.69) |
(0.29) |
(0.51) |
(0.38) | |
|
year 2004 dummy |
0.057 |
0.503 |
0.021 |
0.161 |
|
(0.30) |
(2.56)** |
(0.30) |
(2.76)*** | |
|
year 2004 * Yangtze basin |
0.438 |
-0.311 |
0.177 |
-0.143 |
|
(2.39)** |
(1.63) |
(2.62)*** |
(2.03)** | |
|
household size |
0.121 |
0.158 |
0.019 |
0.017 |
|
(2.40)** |
(2.88)*** |
(0.92) |
(0.96) | |
|
total land holdings |
-0.001 |
0.009 |
0.001 |
0.008 |
|
(0.10) |
(1.20) |
(0.37) |
(2.47)** | |
|
household members with off-farm |
0.547 |
0.767 | ||
|
work in 1999 |
(6.34)*** |
(12.88)*** | ||
|
household members working |
0.755 |
0.753 | ||
|
on-farm in 1999 |
(11.05)*** |
(13.93)*** | ||
|
Constant |
-0.144 |
-0.198 | ||
|
(0.53) |
(0.68) | |||
|
Observations |
130 |
130 |
453 |
453 |
|
R-square |
0.41 |
0.62 |
58
Appendix Table 2. Program impact on off-farm and farm jobs, treatment indicator
interacted with quartile dummies of asset holdings using participating households that
changed status from nonparticipating to participating between 2002 and 2004.
Absolute value of t-statistics in parentheses in (1) and (2); z-statistics in (3) and (4).
* significant at 10 percent level; ** at 5 percent level; *** at 1 percent level