Appendix B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)
Item |
Country |
Study design |
Population features |
Features of intervention |
Mode, provider and setting |
Type of |
Walker et al. |
UK |
RCT |
Age Young people 14-15 year-olds Gender Mixed sex Other information Data presented on sex, |
What is being assessed? Physical / clinical measures What is offered to the young Tailored advice Individual health plan / guides Referral into health system |
What is the mode of the assessment? Questionnaire Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? Practice nurses Intervention site Primary care |
Effectiveness Acceptability |
Walker and |
"UK |
Systematic |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? Single focus on emotional mental What is offered to the young Not applicable |
What is the mode of the assessment? Not stated / unclear Who provides the intervention? Not applicable |
Effectiveness |
Walker and |
UK |
Systematic |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? Unspecified health check What is offered to the young Tailored advice Referral into health system |
What is the mode of the assessment? Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? GPs and practice nurses |
Effectiveness |
A scoping review of the evidence relevant to life checks for young people aged 9 to 14 years
65
More intriguing information
1. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group2. The name is absent
3. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
4. The name is absent
5. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
6. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time
7. Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries
8. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
9. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
10. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6