Appendix B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)
|
Item |
Country |
Study design |
Population features |
Features of intervention |
Mode, provider and setting |
Type of |
|
Supple et al. |
USA |
RCT |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex Other information Data presented on |
What is being assessed? Single focus on emotional health What is offered to the young Not stated / unclear |
What is the mode of the assessment? Computer / online resource Screening tool Questionnaire Who provides the intervention? Self-assessment Intervention site Home |
Effectiveness Acceptability |
|
Vander Stoep (2005) |
USA |
Outcome |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? Single focus on emotional health What is offered to the young Referral into health system Referral within school |
What is the mode of the assessment? Screening tool Who provides the intervention? Self-assessment Intervention site Primary education Secondary education |
Effectiveness Acceptability |
A scoping review of the evidence relevant to life checks for young people aged 9 to 14 years
63
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
3. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
4. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
5. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
6. The name is absent
7. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
8. The name is absent
9. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
10. Types of Cost in Inductive Concept Learning