Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry



We performed the linear as well as negative binomial estimations for these models. The
results were qualitatively similar
16. Table 6B presents the random effects estimates for
the panel data models as the Hausman statistic for FE vs RE failed to reject the null,
indicating that random effects estimates are consistent and more efficient.

The estimates indicate that the NPI with lag 3 and 4 have statistically significant
positive effect on mergers. This result is consistent across all the model specifications.
According to the aggregate analysis a one percent increase in NPIs can increase mergers
between 0.92 and 1.3 percent. The corresponding elasticity for the panel estimates ranges
between 0.06 and 0.16. Thus the mergers analysis reveals that new product introductions
positively affect subsequent mergers in the food industry. Hence it provides evidence in
support of the mechanism through which the anticipatory mergers theory predicts a
positive relationship between NPIs and market concentration.

5. Conclusion

This study provides important insight into the testing of theoretical predictions
about the relationship between market concentration and product variety. The analysis
highlights the fact that accounting for the endogeneity of market concentration plays a
vital role in estimating the effect of market concentration on new product introductions.
Our analysis based on the data of the food industry suggests that market concentration
increases product introductions
17. Number of firms and R&D intensity are also important
factors that positively affect new product introductions. We also find that product

16 In case of negative binomial, convergence could not be achieved in some of the model specifications and
in case of the linear estimations the NPI lags were not significant for the last two models.

17 The number of new product introductions cannot distinguish between the quality of innovation i.e.
improvement of a base product vis -a- vis a new base product. Hence in order to infer about the quality of
innovation from this study, one will need to assume that there is one to one mapping between number of
new product introductions and quality of innovations.

14



More intriguing information

1. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
2. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
3. Ronald Patterson, Violinist; Brooks Smith, Pianist
4. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
5. The constitution and evolution of the stars
6. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
7. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
8. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
9. The name is absent
10. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
11. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
12. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
13. Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
20. The name is absent