CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION



brought to you by _ CORE

provided by Research Papers in Economics


Reap Policy Paper No. 10


ChangingPrices,ChangingCigaretteConsumption

Wayne D. Purcell

Local, state, and national policy makers need to fully
understand the impact of price and reflect that insight
and understanding in their tobacco-use education
programs, in their decisions on the tobacco program,
and in their decisions on efforts to assist producers and
producing communities who will bear the brunt of
coming adjustments.

What is the impact of the announced price increases on
United States tobacco consumption? Following the nationally
negotiated settlement between state attorneys general and
tobacco companies, three groups are extremely interested in
the answer to this question. The health community, interested
in the health ramifications of tobacco use, wants to know
what, if any, decreases in usage will result from price
increases to pay for the settlement. The tobacco community,
concerned about the future of United States tobacco
production, is wondering what price increases will mean to
production quotas and to the tobacco program. Policy makers,
interested in any reduction in consumption, are considering
the ramifications of price increases for administration of the
tobacco program and for health costs.

Retail-level price data are not readily available. The
Economic Research Service, United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) data give the 1998 price of $1.95 per
pack as the median retail price of cigarettes
prior to the
significant increase of $0.45 per pack that the companies
announced in November 1998 (Table 1). That $0.45 per
pack increase suggests the median price by late 1999 or early
2000 could be about $2.40 per pack or a 23 percent increase
in the cost of cigarettes to consumers.

Wayne D. Purcell is Distinguished Alumni Professor,
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Virginia Tech.

Table 1. Retail Price of Cigarettes, 1975-1998

Year

_____Median Retail Price

U.S. Consumption

Nominal

(cents∕pack)........

________Deflated

(billion cigarettes)

1975

44.5

82.7

607

1976

47.9

84.2

614

1977

49.2

81.2

617

1978

54.3

83.3

616

1979

56.8

78.2

622

1980

60.0

72.8

632

1981

63.0

69.3

640

1982

69.7

72.2

634

1983

81.9

82.2

600

1984

94.7

91.4

600

1985

97.8

91.0

594

1986

104.5

95.3

584

1987

110.0

96.8

575

1988

122.2

103.3

563

1989

127.5

102.8

540

1990

144.1

110.0

525

1991

153.3

112.7

510

1992

173.5

123.9

500

1993

183.7

127.2

485

1994

169.3

114.2

486

1995

175.8

115.4

487

1996

179.6

114.5

487

1997

185.4

115.5

480

1998

195.0

119.6

_________470_______

Source: ERS, USDA Tobacco Specialists and Tobacco Briefing Room,
ERS, USDA, May 1999.

The column of deflated prices (Table I) shows cigarette
price with inflation removed using the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) with 1982-84=100. Prices have increased 46 percent
in inflation-adjusted terms since 1982-84, from $0.82 to
almost $1.20. (The price for 1982-1984 was $0.819 per pack.)
Cigarette prices have, thus, increased much faster than overall
prices as measured by the CPI. A $2.40 price for late 1999
would equate to a deflated price of about $ 1.44, up sharply
from the 1998 deflated price of $1.20.

REAP


is the Rural Economic Analysis Program in the Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, College of Agriculture and Life

Sciences at Virginia Tech



More intriguing information

1. Developments and Development Directions of Electronic Trade Platforms in US and European Agri-Food Markets: Impact on Sector Organization
2. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
3. The name is absent
4. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
5. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
6. The name is absent
7. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
8. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
9. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
10. The name is absent
11. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
12. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
13. The name is absent
14. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
18. The name is absent
19. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
20. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin