Hanemann, W. 1984. “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete
responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66 (3), 332-341.
Hanemann, W., J. Loomis and B. Kanninen. 1991. Statistical Efficiency of double bounded dichotomous
choice contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1255-1263.
Harrison G.W. and E.E. Rutstrom. 2006 “Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias
in Value Elicitation Methods, in Handbook of Results in Experimental Economics, eds. C. Plott
and V.L. Smith. New York, Elsevier Science.
Herriges J. and J. Shogren. 1996. Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up
questioning. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 112-131.
List, J.A. and J.F. Shogren 1998. “Calibration of the Differences between Actual and Hypothetical
Valuations in a Field Experiment." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37, 193-205.
List J.A. and C.A. Gallet. 2001. “What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and
Hypothetical Stated Values? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.” Environmental and Resource
Economics 20, 241-254.
Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The
Contingent Valuation Method. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
Murphy, J.J., P.G. Allen, T.H. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead. (2005). "A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical
Bias in Contingent Valuation." Environmental and Resource Economics. 30(3):313-325.
Navrud, S. and E.D. Mungatana. 1994. “Environmental valuation in developing countries: The
recreational value of wildlife viewing.” Ecological Economics, 11, 135-151.
Phaneuf, D.J. and V.K. Smith, 2003. “Recreation demand models.” Chapter 7 in Karl-Goran
Maler and J. Vincent (eds), Handbook OfEnvironmental Economics, North-Holland, Volume 2.
Simon, B. 2005. Passing go: Recreation fees and the use ofpasses to cover entry fees ..Washington DC:
National Park Service.
Taylor, P. A., B. Grandjean and B. Anatchkova. 2006. “Analysis to Assist with Pricing the New
Recreation Pass: Task 5, The Survey.” WYSAC Technical Report No.
SRC-615, 219 pages. Also posted on the website of the U.S. Department of the Interior.
Woolridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
25