Table 3. Percent Responding “YES” to Initial Referendum
|
RDD Sample (N = 462) |
NPF Sample (N = 1461) | ||
|
Price |
Percent Responding _______“YES”_______ |
Price |
Percent Responding _______“YES”______ |
|
25 |
55.5% |
25 |
89.4% |
|
45 |
38.3% |
45 |
79.0% |
|
65 |
22.4% |
65 |
60.2% |
|
85 |
22.0% |
85 |
45.4% |
|
105 |
19.4% |
105 |
33.9% |
|
125 |
10.5% |
125 |
22.8% |
|
145 |
12.7% |
145 |
22.3% |
|
165 |
13.5% |
165 |
13.6% |
Notes. Protest households (67 in RDD sample and 30 in NPF sample) have been omitted.
28
More intriguing information
1. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS2. Robust Econometrics
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
10. Luce Irigaray and divine matter