AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA



FIGURE 2. Timeline of Argentine Legislation82

Plant V arieties


1935


1970


1978


1991


1994


Seed Law

Creation

CONASE


Enforcement Law
1970


Decree 2183
Creation
SENASE


Law 24376

UPOV 78


2000


2004

---∙→∙

INASE re-opened


INASE closed


Decree 2817

Creation INASE


Changes in
Regulations to obtain
permits for use of
GMOs


Creation

Biotechnology Area    Creation Office of

Biotechnology


Genetically

Modified Organisms


1991   1992


1996 1997 1998


2001 2003 2004


1864


Patents             ⅛


First Patent Law


Creation of      Rules for

CONABIA    Obtaining GMOs

Authorization


First authorization for
use and
commercialization


1995


Reform Patent Law
No plant patents


Creation National
Advisory Commission for
Agriculture
Biotechnology


2001

—∙--►

Law allowing patenting
of biotechnology
products and organisms


As Figure 2 shows, the legal framework for plant varieties, both genetically and
non-genetically modified is diffuse, complex, and rapidly changing, producing
complaints and hesitation from seed producers. This particular system has been widely
criticized by international seed producers. For example, Monsanto decided to stop selling
soybean seeds in Argentina because its Roundup Ready soybean variety was being
widely used by farmers who did not pay royalties or user rights of any kind.83 As a
consequence, they decided to stop the commercialization of any soybean varieties in the
country, given the lack of protection. The government has tried to find a solution without
having to change the legal framework—a daunting task given the economic interests at
stake—by proposing the creation of a tax.84

82 For figure data, see generally http://www.sagpya.mecon.gov.ar (last visited Mar. 18, 2006).

83 See Tony Smith, Argentine Soy Exports Are up, but Monsanto Is Not Amused, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 21,
2004, at W1.

84 See Argentina to Propose New Royalty Payment Rules for GM Seed, SEEDQUEST, Jan. 27, 2005,

19



More intriguing information

1. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
2. The name is absent
3. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
4. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
5. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
6. The name is absent
7. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
8. Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries
9. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
10. El Mercosur y la integración económica global