Table 4.Models Disaggregated by Agricultural Potential
(1) General |
(2) Low Potential |
(3) High Potential | |
LID |
0.05 |
0.18*** |
-0.03 |
LID*college education |
(0.24) -1.18* |
(2.91) -0.85** |
(0.10) -1.11* |
Δ dtmrd |
(1.92) |
(2.29) -0.31 |
(1.81) |
Δ mdist |
(0.02) 8.69** |
(0.13) 0.20 |
(0.29) 11.46*** |
Δ agehd |
(2.44) 1.13 |
(0.05) 0.79 |
(2.64) 3.51 |
Δ agehd2 |
(0.46) -0.01 |
(0.25) -0.00 |
(1.01) -0.03 |
Δ cole |
(0.69) 320.24** |
(0.18) 191.45** |
(1.29) 330.17** |
Δ malehd |
(2.30) 29.40 |
(2.34) 18.83 |
(2.23) 48.08 |
Δ padofe |
(1.14) 106.20*** |
(0.77) |
(1.51) 91.16*** |
Δ ldcult |
(5.52) |
(4.57) -0.27 |
(3.33) 0.98 |
Δ nlvstok |
(0.39) 0.77* |
(0.50) 0.92 |
(0.49) 0.76 |
Δ nmalad |
(1.71) 12.29* |
(1.41) 9.59 |
(1.57) 11.45 |
Δ nfemad |
(1.92) 8.98* |
(1.14) 15.47** |
(1.36) 2.89 |
Δ month |
(1.70) -3.08* |
(2.21) -1.29 |
(0.43) -4.22* |
Δ grpmem |
(1.72) 1.73 |
(0.57) |
(1.86) -5.51 |
year dummy |
(0.17) -7.04 |
(0.64) 16.46 |
(0.38) -16.98 |
Observations |
(0.42) 1324 |
(1.46) 430 |
(0.66) |
Robust t statistics in parentheses * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** |
significant at 1% |
Source: Authors calculation
22