Appendices
Table A1. Results of the First Stage Regression and Over-id test
|
Dependent Variable |
(1) LID |
(2) LID*Education |
|
Δ dtmrd |
-0.62 |
-13.17 |
|
(0.43) |
(1.06) | |
|
Δ mdist |
-1.85 |
-31.26 |
|
(0.55) |
(0.90) | |
|
Δ agehd |
-0.75 |
-37.23 |
|
(0.34) |
(0.93) | |
|
Δ agehd2 |
0.01 |
0.19 |
|
(0.30) |
(0.73) | |
|
Δ educhd |
-6.63*** |
189.13*** |
|
(2.63) |
(7.31) | |
|
Δ malehd |
29.79* |
454.66* |
|
(1.66) |
(1.86) | |
|
Δ padofe |
25.90* |
-102.66 |
|
(1.65) |
(0.84) | |
|
Δ ldcult |
-0.82 |
-15.00 |
|
(0.71) |
(1.29) | |
|
Δ nlvstok |
-0.29 |
-1.56 |
|
(1.16) |
(0.63) | |
|
Δ nmalad |
2.42 |
75.55* |
|
(0.45) |
(1.66) | |
|
Δ nfemad |
0.43 |
-10.35 |
|
(0.09) |
(0.23) | |
|
Δ month |
0.75 |
-5.67 |
|
(0.50) |
(0.38) | |
|
Δ grpmem |
5.40 |
44.06 |
|
(0.58) |
(0.39) | |
|
year dummy |
130.85*** |
667.05*** |
|
(10.58) |
(5.03) | |
|
Instruments | ||
|
Lagged Income level |
-0.87*** |
-3.96*** |
|
(12.41) |
(3.70) | |
|
Lagged income*education |
.042*** |
0.33*** |
|
(5.34) |
(3.04) | |
|
Lag mean rainfall deviation |
-2.57*** |
-20.07*** |
|
(3.14) |
(2.97) | |
|
Joint sig of Instrument set | ||
|
F-statistics |
51.90 |
7.11 |
|
p-value |
0.0000 |
0.0001 |
|
Over-id Test | ||
|
Chi-square statistic |
0.184 | |
|
p-value |
0.6676 |
Source: Authors calculation
25
More intriguing information
1. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland2. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
3. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
4. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
5. Job quality and labour market performance
6. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
7. Yield curve analysis
8. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
9. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
10. The name is absent